Seidel v. United States Of America et al
Filing
38
ORDER GRANTING 35 DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO FILE LATE OPPOSITION; DENYING 32 , 33 PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO VACATE HEARING; AND RESETTING MOTIONS FOR HEARING ON DECEMBER 3, 2010. Plaintiff's motion for leave to amend his pleading and Def endant's motion for summary judgment are RESET for hearing on 12/3/2010 at 9:00 AM in Courtroom 3, 5th Floor, San Jose, to be heard concurrently with Plaintiff's motion for leave to join an additional party plaintiff. Signed by Judge Jeremy Fogel on 10/19/2010. (jflc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/19/2010)
Seidel v. United States Of America et al
Doc. 38
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant. THOMAS E. SEIDEL, Plaintiff,
**E-Filed 10/19/2010**
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION
Case Number 5:09-cv-04875-JF/HRL ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO FILE LATE OPPOSITION; DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO VACATE HEARING; AND RESETTING MOTIONS FOR HEARING ON DECEMBER 3, 2010 [re docket entries 32, 33, 35 ]
Defendant's motion for leave to file a late opposition to Seidel's motion to vacate the hearing on the pending motion for summary judgment is GRANTED. Plaintiff's motion to vacate the hearing on Defendant's motion for summary judgment is DENIED. Plaintiff's motion for leave to amend his pleading and Defendant's motion for summary judgment are RESET for hearing on December 3, 2010, to be heard concurrently with Plaintiff's motion for leave to join an additional party plaintiff. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: 10/19/2010 __________________________________ JEREMY FOGEL United States District Judge
C a s e No. 5:09-cv-04875-JF/HRL O R D E R GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO FILE LATE OPPOSITION ETC. ( JF L C 2 )
Dockets.Justia.com
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?