Seidel v. United States Of America et al

Filing 41

ORDER DIRECTING REMOVAL OF DOCUMENT FROM COURT DOCKET (approving 40 ). Signed by Judge Jeremy Fogel on 10/20/2020. (jflc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/20/2010)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Proposed Order for Removal of Document 36 from ECF Case No. 509-cv-04875 Robert Alan Jones, Esq pro hac vice. 1061 E. Flamingo Road, Suite 7 Las Vegas, NV 89119 Telephone: (702) 791-3403 Lead Counsel for Thomas E. Seidel Thomas R. Hogan McPharlin Sprinkles & Thomas LLP 160 W. Santa Clara Street, Suite 400 San Jose, CA 95113 Phone: 408-293-1900 Local Counsel for Thomas E. Seidel **E-Filed 10/20/2010** UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION THOMAS E. SEIDEL, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, and COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 5:09-CV-04875 Honorable Judge Jeremy Fogel ---RO--OSE-D] -[P---- P ----- --ORDER [PROPOSED] ORDER On October 19, 2010, Robert Alan Jones, counsel for Plaintiff Thomas Everett Seidel, ECF E-Filed Document 36, Response to Defendant's Motion for Leave to Late-File Opposition to Motion 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 to Vacate. Inadvertently Defendant included social security numbers on Exhibit 1, Exhibit 2, pg. 1 and Exhibit 2, pg. 2 of Document 36. It is hereby ordered that Document 36 shall be removed from ECF and Defendant Thomas Everett Seidel, shall file re-file the Response to Defendant's Motion for Leave to Late-File Opposition to Motion to Vacate redacting any and all social security numbers. 10/20/2010 Dated: _____________________ _____________________________ United States District Judge Proposed Order for Removal of Document 36 from ECF Case No. 509-cv-04875 Page -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?