Nguyen-Phouc v. Aramark Corporation

Filing 20

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE re Settlement. Stipulated Dismissal or Joint Statement due by 6/18/2010. Order to Show Cause Hearing set for 6/28/2010 09:00 AM. Signed by Judge James Ware on 5/28/2010. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/28/2010)

1
UNIT ED

2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25

S

ISTRIC ES D TC AT T

C N F D IS T IC T O R IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

ER

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION Albert Nguyen-Phouc, Plaintiff, v. Aramark Corporation, Defendant. / NO. C 09-04879 JW ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: SCHEDULING ORDER SETTLEMENT

On May 21, 2010, evaluator Harry Bremond filed a Certification of ENE and notified the Court This case is scheduled for a Case Management Conference on April 26, 2010. Pursuant to that the above-entitled matter has reached a settlement. (See Docket Item No. 19.) In light of the settlement, the Court Civil Procedure and pretrial dates. On or before June 18, conferred parties shall the Federal Rules of vacates all trial Local Rules of this Court, the parties 2010, the and duly file a stipulated dismissal pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a). submiIfea dismissal is not filed by the specified and Proposed Order. appear in Courtroom No.17.)4th tt d a Joint Case Management Statement date, all parties shall (See Docket Item No. # 8, Floor, United States submission, it appears thatFirst Street, for the case can be set 28, 2010the 9 a.m. Based on their joint District Court, 280 South a schedule San Jose, Ca on June without at and to show cause, if any, why the case should not be dismissed pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). necor ity of June 18, 2010, this time. Accordingly, the Case Management Conference is On essbeforean appearance atthe parties shall file a joint statement in response to the Order to Show Cause. The joint statement shall set forth the status of the activities of the parties for finalizing the VACATE and how parties are ordered to comply with the following schedule: settlementD and themuch additional time is requested to finalize and file the dismissal. If a voluntary dismissal is filed as ordered, the Order to Show SCHEDULE will be automatically vacated. CASE Cause hearing Failure to comply with any part of this Order will be deemed sufficient grounds to dismiss this action. of All Discovery (¶ 9) Close November 19, 2010

Last May 28, 2010 January Dated: Date for Hearing Dispositive Motions (¶ 10) ___________________________ 24, 2011 (.60 days after the Close of All Discovery) JAMES WARE Preliminary Pretrial Conference at 11 a.m. (¶ 12) District Judgetober 18, 2010 Oc United States 26 (.30 days before the Close of All Discovery) 27 Preliminary Pretrial Conference Statements (¶ 11) October 8, 2010 (Due 10 days before conference) 28

A

LI

FO

m Judge Ja

es Ware

R NIA

O OR IT IS S

DERED

RT U O

NO

RT

H

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT COPIES OF THIS ORDER HAVE BEEN DELIVERED TO: Kathryn M. Dancisak [e-mail] Melinda S. Riechert [e-mail] Steven Paul Cohn [e-mail]

Dated: May 28, 2010 April 21, 2010

Richard W. Wieking, Clerk By: /s/ JW Chambers Elizabeth Garcia Courtroom Deputy

5