Curry v. Hansen Medical, Inc. et al

Filing 27

STIPULATION AND ORDER RE FILING OF A SECOND CONSOLIDATED AMENDED COMPLAINT AND DEFENDANTS' RESPONSES THERETO (approving 26 ). Signed by Judge Jeremy Fogel on 7/15/2010. (jflc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/15/2010)

Download PDF
Curry v. Hansen Medical, Inc. et al Doc. 27 Case5:09-cv-05094-JF Document27 Filed07/15/10 Page1 of 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 LIONEL Z. GLANCY (#134180) MICHAEL GOLDBERG (#188669) GLANCY BINKOW & GOLDBERG LLP 1801 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 311 Los Angeles, California 90067 Telephone: (310) 201-9150 Facsimile: (310) 201-9160 E-mail: info@glancylaw.com Lead Counsel for Plaintiffs **E-Filed 7/15/2010** UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION ROBERT CURRY, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiff, v. HANSEN MEDICAL, INC., FREDERIC H. MOLL, STEVEN M. VAN DICK, and GARY C. RESTANI, Defendants. AND RELATED ACTIONS No. 5:09-cv-05094-JF Class Action STIPULATION AND -----------------[PROPOSED] ORDER RE FILING OF A SECOND CONSOLIDATED AMENDED COMPLAINT AND DEFENDANTS' RESPONSES THERETO Judge: Hon. Jeremy Fogel WHEREAS, by Stipulation and Order dated April 26, 2010 (Docket #21), the parties set a schedule for filing of a Consolidated Amended Complaint for Violations of the Federal Securities Laws (the "Consolidated Amended Complaint") and Defendants' contemplated motion(s) to dismiss; WHEREAS, the April 26, 2010 Stipulation and Order provides that (i) Lead Plaintiffs shall file a Consolidated Amended Complaint no later than May 10, 2010, (ii) Defendants shall respond to the Consolidated Amended Complaint on or before July 9, 2010, (iii) Lead Plaintiffs shall respond to any motion to dismiss on or before August 23, 2010, and (iv) Defendants shall file any reply on or before September 22, 2010; No. 09-cv-05094-JF STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE FILING OF A [PROPOSED] SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT AND DEFENDANTS' RESPONSES THERETO Page 1 Dockets.Justia.com Case5:09-cv-05094-JF Document27 Filed07/15/10 Page2 of 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 WHEREAS, Lead Plaintiffs Consolidated Amended Complaint was filed with the Court on May 10, 2010; WHEREAS, on May 11, 2010, Lead Plaintiffs filed a [Corrected] Consolidated Amended Complaint, which corrected the Consolidated Amended Complaint only insofar as the [Corrected] Consolidated Amended Complaint added the names of defendants Frederic H. Moll, Steven M. Van Dick and Gary C. Restani to the caption; WHEREAS, after filing the [Corrected] Consolidated Amended Complaint, Lead Plaintiffs diligently continued to investigate their claims and Lead Plaintiffs' investigator found additional information highly relevant to the allegations contained in the [Corrected] Consolidated Amended Complaint; WHEREAS, Lead Plaintiffs determined that in the interest of judicial economy, rather than proceeding with briefing on the [Corrected] Consolidated Amended Complaint, at this juncture, it would be more efficient to further amend the [Corrected] Consolidated Amended Complaint to include the new information obtained by Lead Plaintiffs; WHEREAS, through their counsel, Lead Plaintiffs promptly notified counsel for the Defendants of Lead Plaintiffs' intention to further amend the [Corrected] Consolidated Amended Complaint; WHEREAS, counsel for the parties have further conferred and agreed regarding the filing of a Second Consolidated Amended Complaint and a new briefing schedule thereon; and WHEREAS, the parties have agreed that a copy of the [Proposed] Second Consolidated Amended Complaint (attached hereto as Exhibit A) should be filed; NOW, THEREFORE, the undersigned parties hereby stipulate and agree, and respectfully request that the Court enter an Order as follows: 1. Lead Plaintiffs will file and serve the Second Consolidated Amended Complaint within ten (10) calendar days of the Court's entry of this Stipulation and Order; No. 09-cv-05094-JF STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE FILING OF A [PROPOSED] SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT AND DEFENDANTS' RESPONSES THERETO Page 2 Case5:09-cv-05094-JF Document27 Filed07/15/10 Page3 of 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2. Defendants shall respond to the Second Consolidated Amended Complaint on or before September 17, 2010; 3. In the event Defendants file a motion(s) to dismiss, Lead Plaintiffs shall file their oppositions to defendants' motion(s) to dismiss on or before November 1, 2010; 4. 5. Defendants shall file their repl(ies) on or before December 10, 2010; and Defendants shall notice their motions to dismiss for hearing on January 14, 2011, at 9:00 a.m. in Courtroom 3. IT IS SO STIPULATED. DATED: July 6, 2010 GLANCY BINKOW & GOLDBERG LLP By: /s/ Michael Goldberg Lionel Z. Glancy Michael Goldberg Lead Counsel for Lead Plaintiffs DATED: July 6, 2010 BINGHAM MCCUTCHEN LLP By: /s/ John D. Pernick David M. Balabanian (# 37368) Charlene S. Shimada (# 91407) John D. Pernick (#1155468) Counsel for Defendants Hansen Medical, Inc., Frederic H. Moll, Steven M. Van Dick, and Gary C. Restani I, Michael Goldberg, am the ECF User whose ID and password are being used to file this STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER. In compliance with General Order 45, X.B., I hereby attest that John D. Pernick has concurred in this filing. /s/ Michael Goldberg Michael Goldberg No. 09-cv-05094-JF STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE FILING OF A [PROPOSED] SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT AND DEFENDANTS' RESPONSES THERETO Page 3 Case5:09-cv-05094-JF Document27 Filed07/15/10 Page4 of 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 No. 09-cv-05094-JF STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE FILING OF A [PROPOSED] SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT AND DEFENDANTS' RESPONSES THERETO Page 4 -[PRO--O--ED- ORDER ------- P-- S---- ] PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 15 DATED: July ____ , 2010 By:_________________________________ The Honorable Jeremy Fogel United States District Judge Case5:09-cv-05094-JF Document27 Filed07/15/10 Page5 of 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 PROOF OF SERVICE BY ELECTRONIC POSTING PURSUANT TO NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA LOCAL RULES AND ECF GENERAL ORDER NO. 45 AND BY MAIL ON ALL KNOWN NON-REGISTERED PARTIES I, the undersigned, say: I am a citizen of the United States and am employed in the office of a member of the Bar of this Court. I am over the age of 18 and not a party to the within action. My business address is 1801 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 311, Los Angeles, California 90067. On July 6, 2010, I caused to be served the following document: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE FILING OF A SECOND CONSOLIDATED AMENDED COMPLAINT AND DEFENDANTS' RESPONSES THERETO on all ECF-registered parties in the action as follows: See attached Service List. I certify under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the 13 foregoing is true and correct. Executed on July 6, 2010, at Los Angeles, California. 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE POS ECF 07 06 2010.wpd s/ Michael Goldberg Michael Goldberg Page 1 CAND-ECF- https://ecf.cand.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/MailList.pl?331731021126978-L_3... Case5:09-cv-05094-JF Document27 Filed07/15/10 Page6 of 6 Mailing Information for a Case 5:09-cv-05094-JF Electronic Mail Notice List The following are those who are currently on the list to receive e-mail notices for this case. Peter Arthur Binkow info@glancylaw.com,pbinkow@glancylaw.com Michael M. Goldberg info@glancylaw.com John D. Pernick john.pernick@bingham.com Manual Notice List The following is the list of attorneys who are not on the list to receive e-mail notices for this case (who therefore require manual noticing). You may wish to use your mouse to select and copy this list into your word processing program in order to create notices or labels for these recipients. Lionel Z Glacny Glancy Binkow & Goldberg LLP 1801 Avenue of the Stars Suite 311 Los Angeles, CA 90067 1 of 2 7/6/2010 6:01 PM

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?