Curry v. Hansen Medical, Inc. et al

Filing 31

STIPULATION AND ORDER RE RESPONSES TO SECOND CONSOLIDATED AMENDED COMPLAINT (approving 30 ). Signed by Judge Jeremy Fogel on 9/9/2010. (jflc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/9/2010)

Download PDF
Curry v. Hansen Medical, Inc. et al Doc. 31 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 BINGHAM MCCUTCHEN LLP David M. Balabanian (SBN 37368) david.balabanian@bingham.com Charlene S. Shimada (SBN 91407) charlene.shimada@bingham.com John D. Pernick (SBN 155468) john.pernick@bingham.com Three Embarcadero Center San Francisco, CA 94111-4067 Telephone: 415.393.2000 Attorneys for Defendants Hansen Medical, Inc., Fredrick H. Moll, Steven M. Van Dick and Gary C. Restani **E-Filed 9/9/2010** UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION ROBERT CURRY, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. HANSEN MEDICAL INC., FREDERICK H. MOLL and STEVEN M. VAN DICK, Defendants. Case No. 09-cv-5094 JF STIPULATION AND ------------------[PROPOSED] ORDER RE RESPONSES TO SECOND CONSOLIDATED AMENDED COMPLAINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE RESPONSES TO SECOND CONSOLIDATED AMENDED COMPLAINT Case No. 09-cv-5094 JF Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2010; WHEREAS, by Stipulation and Order dated July 15, 2010 (Docket #27), the parties set a briefing schedule for Defendants' responses to the Second Consolidated Amended Complaint for Violations of the Federal Securities Laws (the "Second Consolidated Amended Complaint"); WHEREAS, the parties have scheduled a mediation in this matter for September 29, WHEREAS, the parties agree that in order to avoid unnecessary legal expenses and in the interests of justice and judicial economy, Defendants' responses to the Second Consolidated Amended Complaint should be postponed while the parties pursue their attempts to resolve their dispute; WHEREAS, counsel for the parties have conferred and agreed on a new briefing schedule; THEREFORE the parties, by and through their undersigned counsel of record, hereby agree and stipulate to the following: 1. Defendants shall respond to the Second Consolidated Amended Complaint on or before October 13, 2010 3. In the event Defendants file a motion(s) to dismiss, Lead Plaintiffs shall file their opposition(s) to Defendants' motion(s) to dismiss on or before December 6, 2010; 4. Defendants shall file their repl(ies) on or before January 21, 2011; and 5. Defendants shall notice their motion(s) to dismiss for hearing on February 18, 2011, at 9:00 a.m. in Courtroom 3. 1 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE RESPONSES TO SECOND CONSOLIDATED AMENDED COMPLAINT Case No. 09-cv-5094 JF 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 The parties respectfully request that the Court enter an Order approving this Stipulation. DATED: September 7, 2010 BINGHAM MCCUTCHEN LLP David M. Balabanian Charlene S. Shimada John D. Pernick Three Embarcadero Center San Francisco, CA 94111 Telephone: 415.393.2000 Facsimile: 415.393.2286 By: /s/ John D. Pernick John D. Pernick Attorneys for Defendants Hansen Medical, Inc., Fredrick H. Moll, Steven M. Van Dick and Gary C. Restani DATED: September 7, 2010 GLACY, BINKOW & GOLDBERG LLP Lionel Z. Glancy Michael Goldberg 1801 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 311 Los Angeles, California 90067 Telephone: (310) 201-9150 Facsimile: (310) 201-9160 By: /s/ Lionel Z. Glancy Lionel Z. Glancy Lead Counsel for Plaintiffs 2 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE RESPONSES TO SECOND CONSOLIDATED AMENDED COMPLAINT Case No. 09-cv-5094 JF 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 IT IS SO ORDERED. Sept. 9 DATED: _________, 2010 ------------------ ORDER [PROPOSED] By: The Honorable Jeremy Fogel United States District Court Judge 3 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE RESPONSES TO SECOND CONSOLIDATED AMENDED COMPLAINT Case No. 09-cv-5094 JF 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ATTESTATION PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 45 I, John D. Pernick, attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from any signatories indicated by a "conformed" signature (/s/) within this e-filed document. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed this 7th day of September, 2010, at San Francisco, California. BINGHAM MCCUTCHEN LLP By: /s/ John D. Pernick John D. Pernick Attorneys for Defendants Hansen Medical, Inc., Fredrick H. Moll, Steven M. Van Dick and Gary C. Restani 4 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE RESPONSES TO SECOND CONSOLIDATED AMENDED COMPLAINT Case No. 09-cv-5094 JF 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 CERTIFICATE OF MAILING I hereby certify that on September 7, 2010, I electronically transmitted the attached document to the Clerk's Office using the CM/ECF System for filing and transmittal of a Notice of Electronic Filing to the CM/ECF registrants on record. By: /s/ Diane R. Imai Diane R. Imai 5 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE RESPONSES TO SECOND CONSOLIDATED AMENDED COMPLAINT Case No. 09-cv-5094 JF

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?