Huang v. Bell et al

Filing 77

ORDER RE 75 , 76 DOCUMENTS FILED ON APRIL 6, 2010. Signed by Judge Jeremy Fogel on 4/12/2010. (jflc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/12/2010)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 **E-Filed 4/12/2010** IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION YONG TAN HUANG, Plaintiff, v. TIM BELL, et al., Defendants. Case Number C 09-5099 JF (PVT) ORDER1 RE DOCUMENTS FILED ON APRIL 6, 2010 On February 2, 2010, the Court dismissed this action without prejudice for failure to pay the filing fee. On March 24, 2010, the Court denied Plaintiff's motion for relief from the order of dismissal. The Court stated its reasons for denying relief and pointed out that Plaintiff could file a new action as dismissal of the instant action was without prejudice. On April 6, 2010, Plaintiff filed a document titled "COMPLAINT (Amended), DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL," and a document titled "DECLARATION OF YONG TAN HUANG." These documents are without legal effect as this action has been CLOSED. As noted This disposition is not designated for publication in the official reports. C a s e No. C 09-5099 JF (PVT) O R D E R RE DOCUMENTS FILED APRIL 6, 2010 ( JF L C 2 ) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 in the Court's prior orders, Plaintiff may file a new action against these Defendants if he wishes to do so. DATED: 4/12/2010 __________________________________ JEREMY FOGEL United States District Judge 2 C a se No. C 09-5099 JF (PVT) O R D E R RE DOCUMENTS FILED APRIL 6, 2010 ( JF L C 2 ) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Copies of Order served on: Yong Tan Huang 345 N. 5th Street San Jose, CA 95112 Hugh Francis Lennon hfl@robinsonwood.com, rmm@robinsonwood.com 3 C a se No. C 09-5099 JF (PVT) O R D E R RE DOCUMENTS FILED APRIL 6, 2010 ( JF L C 2 )

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?