Faylor et al v. California Reconveyance Company et al
Filing
36
ORDER Setting Deadline for Parties to File Joint Status Report. Signed by Judge Koh on 12/13/2010. (lhklc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/13/2010)
Faylor et al v. California Reconveyance Company et al
Doc. 36
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 TERRY L. FAYLOR, ET AL., v. Plaintiffs, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No.: 09-CV-05213-LHK ORDER SETTING DEADLINE FOR PARTIES TO FILE JOINT STATUS REPORT
CALIFORNIA RECONVEYANCE CO., ET AL., Defendants.
Defendants have filed a motion to dismiss, which is set for hearing on January 13, 2011. See Dkt. #33. In an opposition to that motion, Plaintiffs state that the parties actually "reached a settlement agreement" back in April 2010. See Dkt. #35. Plaintiffs, however, also state that "it is unknown at this time by plaintiffs the status of the consummation of the Settlement Agreement and the requested refinance." Id. Plaintiffs attached a purported copy of the Settlement Agreement to their opposition, but that copy is not signed by any representative for Defendants. Thus, it is not clear to the Court if the case has settled. Accordingly, by Monday, December 20, 2010, or sooner if practicable, the parties shall meet and confer and file a joint status report. If the case has settled, the parties should file a stipulation of dismissal. If the case has not settled, the January 13, 2011 hearing will proceed. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: December 13, 2010 _________________________________ LUCY H. KOH United States District Judge
Case No.: 09-CV-05213-LHK ORDER SETTING DEADLINE FOR PARTIES TO FILE JOINT STATUS REPORT
Dockets.Justia.com
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?