Uvalles v. Jaquez et al
Filing
172
ORDER by Judge Ronald M. Whyte Granting 152 , 157 Motions for Extension of Time. (jg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/6/2012)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
RAUL UVALLES,
11
Plaintiff,
12
v.
13
FRANCISCO JACQUEZ, et al.,
14
Defendants.
15
16
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
No. C 09-5221 RMW (PR)
ORDER GRANTING
DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS FOR
EXTENSION OF TIME
(Docket Nos. 152, 157)
Defendants’ motions for an extension of time to file their dispositive motion is granted.
17
Due to the age of this case, no further requests for an extension of time will be favored absent
18
exigent circumstances. Defendants’ dispositive motion is due on or before February 28, 2012.
19
Plaintiff’s opposition is due no later than thirty days thereafter. Defendants’ reply brief is due
20
fifteen days after Plaintiff’s opposition is filed.
21
22
23
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: _________________
RONALD M. WHYTE
United States District Judge
24
25
26
27
28
Order Granting Defendants’ Motions for an Extension of Time
P:\pro-se\sj.rmw\cr.09\Uvalles221eot2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
RAUL UVALLES,
Case Number: CV09-05221 RMW
Plaintiff,
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
v.
FRANCISCO JAQUEZ et al,
Defendant.
/
I, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am an employee in the Office of the Clerk, U.S. District
Court, Northern District of California.
That on March 6, 2012, I SERVED a true and correct copy(ies) of the attached, by placing said
copy(ies) in a postage paid envelope addressed to the person(s) hereinafter listed, by depositing
said envelope in the U.S. Mail, or by placing said copy(ies) into an inter-office delivery
receptacle located in the Clerk's office.
Raul Uvalles T-59954
Pelican Bay State Prison
Housing: C9-106
P.O. Box 7500
Crescent City, CA 95532
Dated: March 6, 2012
Richard W. Wieking, Clerk
By: Jackie Lynn Garcia, Deputy Clerk
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?