Uvalles v. Jaquez et al

Filing 172

ORDER by Judge Ronald M. Whyte Granting 152 , 157 Motions for Extension of Time. (jg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/6/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 RAUL UVALLES, 11 Plaintiff, 12 v. 13 FRANCISCO JACQUEZ, et al., 14 Defendants. 15 16 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. C 09-5221 RMW (PR) ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME (Docket Nos. 152, 157) Defendants’ motions for an extension of time to file their dispositive motion is granted. 17 Due to the age of this case, no further requests for an extension of time will be favored absent 18 exigent circumstances. Defendants’ dispositive motion is due on or before February 28, 2012. 19 Plaintiff’s opposition is due no later than thirty days thereafter. Defendants’ reply brief is due 20 fifteen days after Plaintiff’s opposition is filed. 21 22 23 IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: _________________ RONALD M. WHYTE United States District Judge 24 25 26 27 28 Order Granting Defendants’ Motions for an Extension of Time P:\pro-se\sj.rmw\cr.09\Uvalles221eot2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA RAUL UVALLES, Case Number: CV09-05221 RMW Plaintiff, CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE v. FRANCISCO JAQUEZ et al, Defendant. / I, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am an employee in the Office of the Clerk, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California. That on March 6, 2012, I SERVED a true and correct copy(ies) of the attached, by placing said copy(ies) in a postage paid envelope addressed to the person(s) hereinafter listed, by depositing said envelope in the U.S. Mail, or by placing said copy(ies) into an inter-office delivery receptacle located in the Clerk's office. Raul Uvalles T-59954 Pelican Bay State Prison Housing: C9-106 P.O. Box 7500 Crescent City, CA 95532 Dated: March 6, 2012 Richard W. Wieking, Clerk By: Jackie Lynn Garcia, Deputy Clerk

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?