Carnero et al v. Washington Mutual (WAMU) Chase Bank et al

Filing 29

ORDER GRANTING 27 RENEWED APPLICATION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER AND SETTING HEARING. Signed by Judge Jeremy Fogel on 1/6/2010. (jflc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/6/2010)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 **E-Filed 1/6/2010** IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION GABRIELA R. CARNERO, et al., Plaintiffs, v. WASHINGTON MUTUAL (WAMU), et al., Defendants. Case Number C 09-5330 JF (RS) ORDER1 GRANTING RENEWED APPLICATION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER AND SETTING HEARING Re: Docket No. 27 On December 30, 2009, this Court denied Plaintiffs' application for a temporary restraining order ("TRO"), noting inter alia that Plaintiffs had not stated clearly that a trustee's sale of the property was imminent, had not provided the date of any such sale, and had not explained why their application had not been filed earlier. Today Plaintiffs filed a document entitled "URGENT - MOTION TO OBJECT TO THE DENIAL OF HON. JEREMY FOGEL'S ORDER OF TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER," which the Court construes as a renewed This disposition is not designated for publication in the official reports. C a s e No. C 09-5330 JF (RS) O R D E R GRANTING RENEWED MOTION FOR TRO ( JF L C 2 ) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 application for TRO. Plaintiffs now state that a trustee's sale has been scheduled for tomorrow, January 7, 2010; that they received notice of the sale on December 17, 2009; and that they delayed filing their TRO application for some days because they were under the (mistaken) belief that they first had to pursue an application for a lis pendens. Plaintiffs attach proof of facsimile service of their TRO application upon Defendant Quality Loan Service Corporation ("Quality"), the entity that appears to have scheduled the trustee's sale. The Court has solicited but has not received opposition from Quality, nor has it received opposition from any other defendant. Given Plaintiffs' pro se status, their clarification regarding the imminence of the trustee's sale, their explanation as to the timing of their application for TRO, and the lack of opposition, the Court will issue a TRO effective until 5:00 p.m. on Friday, January 15, 2010, or until further order of the Court. A hearing will be scheduled for Friday, January 15, 2010 at 9:00 on Plaintiffs' application. ORDER Good cause therefor appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiffs' application for a TRO is GRANTED. Defendants shall not proceed with the trustee's sale until after 5:00 p.m. on Friday, January 15, 2010 or until further order of the Court. A hearing is set for Friday, January 15, 2010 at 9:00 on Plaintiffs' application. DATED: January 6, 2010 JEREMY FOGEL United States District Judge 2 C a s e No. C 09-5330 JF (RS) O R D E R GRANTING RENEWED MOTION FOR TRO ( JF L C 2 ) 1 2 3 4 This Order has been served upon the following persons: David C. Scott dscott@mccarthyholthus.com Glenn Harlan Wechsler glenn@glennwechsler.com, larry@glennwechsler.com, linda@glennwechsler.com Lawrence Daniel Harris larry@glennwechsler.com lrodriguez@mccarthyholthus.com 5 Matthew Edward Podmenik 6 Roshni V Patel 7 Seth Michael Harris 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 C a s e No. C 09-5330 JF (RS) O R D E R GRANTING RENEWED MOTION FOR TRO ( JF L C 2 ) RPatel@mccarthyholthus.com seharris@mccarthyholthus.com, civilefile@mccarthyholthus.com Gabriela R. Carnero Jose R. Carnero 5645 Blossom Avenue San Jose, CA 95123 Gabriela R. Carnero Jose R. Carnero 1558 1/2 Minnesota Avenue San Jose, CA 95125

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?