Kent v. Hewlett-Packard Company

Filing 51

STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT AND FILE DECLARATION RE SEALED MATERIAL re 49 . Signed by Judge Jeremy Fogel on 9/30/10. (dlm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/4/2010)

Kent v. Hewlett-Packard Company

Doc. 51

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

SAMUEL G. LIVERSIDGE, SBN 180578 [e-mail] TIMOTHY W. LOOSE, SBN 241037 [e-mail] GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP 333 South Grand Avenue Los Angeles, California 90071-3197 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] KRISTOFOR T. HENNING (pro hac vice pending) [e-mail] MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP 1701 Market Street Philadelphia, PA 19103 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] Attorneys for Defendant, HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA (SAN JOSE DIVISION) MICHAEL A. KENT, DANIEL JOHANNING, AND JAKUB CMIRAL, individually and on behalf of all those similarly situated, v. Plaintiffs, CASE NO. C 09-05341 JF STIPULATION AND -----------------[PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT AND FILE DECLARATION RE SEALED MATERIAL

HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY, a Delaware corporation, Defendant.

Case No. C 09-05341 JF ­ STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT AND FILE DECLARATION RE SEALED MATERIAL

1

Dockets.Justia.com

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Case No. C 09-05341 JF ­ STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT AND FILE DECLARATION RE SEALED MATERIAL

WHEREAS, the parties continue to explore the possibility of settlement and believe a two week extension of time with respect to pending deadlines will allow the parties to determine whether settlement is possible at this stage of the litigation; IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties, through their respective counsel, that 1. Defendant Hewlett-Packard Company ("HP") may have a 14-day extension of

time to file its response to Plaintiffs' Second Amended Complaint. HP's response will be due November 5, 2010. 2. HP also may have a 14-day extension of time to file its declaration establishing

that the redacted information in Plaintiffs' Second Amended Complaint is sealable, in accord with Local Rule 79-5(d). HP's declaration will be due October 15, 2010.

Dated: September 28, 2010

By:

/s/ Samuel G. Liversidge Samuel G. Liversidge GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP Attorneys for Defendant, Hewlett-Packard Co. /s/ Michael F. Ram Michael F. Ram RAM & OLSON LLP Attorneys for Plaintiffs

Dated: September 28, 2010

By:

IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: 9/30/10 The Honorable Jeremy Fogel United States District Court Judge

2