Hsich v. Stanford University et al
Filing
180
JUDGMENT. The Court having granted Defendants' respective motions for summary judgment (and having denied Plaintiff's motions for the same) in their entirety, IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED THAT judgment be entered in favor of Defendants. Signed by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd on 4/20/2011. (hrllc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/20/2011)
1
** E-filed April 20, 2011 **
2
3
4
5
6
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
For the Northern District of California
NOT FOR CITATION
8
United States District Court
7
SAN JOSE DIVISION
11
FANG-YUH HSIEH,
No. C09-05455 HRL
Plaintiff,
12
JUDGMENT
v.
13
[Re: Docket Nos. 100, 116, 127, 131]
STANFORD UNIVERSITY, et al.,
14
15
16
Defendants.
____________________________________/
The court having granted Defendants’ respective motions for summary judgment (and
17
having denied Plaintiff’s motions for the same) in their entirety, IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED
18
AND DECREED THAT judgment be entered in favor of Defendants.
19
20
21
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: April 20, 2011
HOWARD R. LLOYD
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
C09-05455 HRL Notice will be electronically mailed to:
2
Ana N. Damonte
Jennifer S Wang
3
4
Rosa Maria Loya
Sarah G. Flanagan
ana.damonte@pillsburylaw.com, docket@pillsburylaw.com
jennifer.s.wang@usdoj.gov, bonny.wong@usdoj.gov, lily.c.ho
vuong@usdoj.gov, wilson.wong@usdoj.gov
rosa.loya@gmail.com
sarah.flanagan@pillsburylaw.com, docket@pillsburylaw.com,
susie.macken@pillsburylaw.com
5
Notice will be provided by other means to:
6
7
Fang-Yuh Hsieh
1394 University Avenue
Palo Alto, CA 94301
8
9
Counsel are responsible for distributing copies of this document to co-counsel who have not
registered for e-filing under the court’s CM/ECF program.
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?