Hsich v. Stanford University et al

Filing 180

JUDGMENT. The Court having granted Defendants' respective motions for summary judgment (and having denied Plaintiff's motions for the same) in their entirety, IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED THAT judgment be entered in favor of Defendants. Signed by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd on 4/20/2011. (hrllc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/20/2011)

Download PDF
1 ** E-filed April 20, 2011 ** 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 For the Northern District of California NOT FOR CITATION 8 United States District Court 7 SAN JOSE DIVISION 11 FANG-YUH HSIEH, No. C09-05455 HRL Plaintiff, 12 JUDGMENT v. 13 [Re: Docket Nos. 100, 116, 127, 131] STANFORD UNIVERSITY, et al., 14 15 16 Defendants. ____________________________________/ The court having granted Defendants’ respective motions for summary judgment (and 17 having denied Plaintiff’s motions for the same) in their entirety, IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED 18 AND DECREED THAT judgment be entered in favor of Defendants. 19 20 21 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: April 20, 2011 HOWARD R. LLOYD UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 C09-05455 HRL Notice will be electronically mailed to: 2 Ana N. Damonte Jennifer S Wang 3 4 Rosa Maria Loya Sarah G. Flanagan ana.damonte@pillsburylaw.com, docket@pillsburylaw.com jennifer.s.wang@usdoj.gov, bonny.wong@usdoj.gov, lily.c.ho vuong@usdoj.gov, wilson.wong@usdoj.gov rosa.loya@gmail.com sarah.flanagan@pillsburylaw.com, docket@pillsburylaw.com, susie.macken@pillsburylaw.com 5 Notice will be provided by other means to: 6 7 Fang-Yuh Hsieh 1394 University Avenue Palo Alto, CA 94301 8 9 Counsel are responsible for distributing copies of this document to co-counsel who have not registered for e-filing under the court’s CM/ECF program. For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?