Gonzales, et al. v. Lucille Packard Children's Hospital, et al.
Filing
10
STIPULATION and ORDER for extension of time in which to respond to plaintiffs' complaint signed by Judge Oliver W. Wanger on 11/16/2009. (Kusamura, W) Modified on 11/23/2009 (bw, COURT STAFF).
1 LAURIE E. SHERWOOD, State Bar No. 155312 ALEXANDER F. PEVZNER, State Bar No. 221606 2 WALSWORTH FRANKLIN BEVINS & McCALL, LLP 601 Montgomery Street, Ninth Floor 3 San Francisco, California 94111-2612 Telephone: (415) 781-7072 4 Facsimile: (415) 391-6258 5 Attorneys for Defendant MEDEFIL, INC. 6 OF COUNSEL: 7 BARRY R. MURNER, ESQ. SEELEY, SAVIDGE, EBERT & GOURASH CO., LPA 8 26600 Detroit Road Cleveland, OH 44145-2397 9 10 11 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA FRESNO DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) -1770056.1
13 ART GONZALES and MARY GONZALES, Individually and as Successors-in-Interest of the 14 Estate of M.G., 15 16 v. Plaintiffs,
Case No. 1:09-CV-01958-OWW-SMS STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME IN WHICH TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFFS' COMPLAINT
17 LUCILLE PACKARD CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL, STANFORD HOSPITAL AND 18 CLINICS, 19 BAXTER HEALTHCARE CORP. c/o Ct Corporation System 20 4169 Westport Road Louisville, KY 40207 21 and 22 BAXTER INTERNATIONAL, INC. 23 One Baxter Parkway Deerfield, IL 60015 24 and 25 SCIENTIFIC PROTEIN LABORATORIES, 26 INC. c/o CT Corporation System, Registered Agent 27 8040 Excelsior Dr., Suite 200 Madison, WI 53717 28
Walsworth, Franklin, Bevins & McCall, LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
Case No. 1:09-CV-01958-OWW-SMS
STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME IN WHICH TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFFS' COMPLAINT
1807-3.2131 PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com
1 and 2 CHANGZHOU SPL COMPANY, LTD. aka KAIPU BIOCHEMICAL CO. 3 3 Changhong West Road Wujing, Changzhou City 4 Jiangsu Province, China 5 and 6 AMERICAN CAPITAL LTD. Two Bethesda Metro Center 7 14th Floor Bethesda, MD 20814 8 and 9 B. BRAUN MEDICAL, INC. 10 c/o CSC-Lawyers Inc. Service Co. 421 W. Main St. 11 Frankfort, KY 40601 12 and 13 TYCO HEALTHCARE GROUP, LP N/K/A COVIDIEN AND COVIDIEN INC. 14 c/o CT Corporation System 4169 Westport Road 15 Louisville, KY 40207 16 and 17 MEDEFIL, INC. 250 Windy Point Dr. 18 Glendale Heights, IL 60139 19 DOES 1 through 100, inclusive, 20 21 22 Defendants.
) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiffs ART GONZALES and MARY
23 GONZALES, Individually and as Successors-in-Interest of the Estate of M.G. ("Plaintiffs"), and 24 Defendant MEDEFIL, INC., by and through their respective counsel, that Medefil, Inc. shall have 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 ///
Walsworth, Franklin, Bevins & McCall, LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
-2770056.1
Case No. 1:09-CV-01958-OWW-SMS
STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME IN WHICH TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFFS' COMPLAINT
1807-3.2131 PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com
1 and hereby is granted an extension of time through and including December 14, 2009, in which to 2 file and serve a responsive pleading to Plaintiffs' Complaint. 3 4 Dated: November 13, 2009 5 6 7 8 9 10 Dated: November 13, 2009 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 Dated: November 16, 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Walsworth, Franklin, Bevins & McCall, LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
ROBINSON, CALCAGNIE, ROBINSON
By:
/s/ Karren T. Schaeffer KARREN T. SCHAEFFER Attorneys for Plaintiffs ART GONZALES and MARY GONZALES, Individually and as Successor-in-Interest of the Estate of M.G.
WALSWORTH FRANKLIN BEVINS & McCALL, LLP
By:
/s/ Laurie E. Sherwood LAURIE E. SHERWOOD Attorneys for Defendant MEDEFIL, INC.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
2009
/s/ OLIVER W. WANGER
THE HONORABLE OLIVER W. WANGER Judge of the United States District Court
-3770056.1
Case No. 1:09-CV-01958-OWW-SMS
STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME IN WHICH TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFFS' COMPLAINT
1807-3.2131 PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?