Steshenko v. McKay et al

Filing 166

ORDER REVOKING PRIOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL, REFERRING LITIGANT TO FEDERAL PRO BONO PROJECT, AND STAYING PROCEEDINGS PENDING APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 10/25/11. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/25/2011)

Download PDF
*E-Filed 10/25/11* 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SAN JOSE DIVISION 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 8 12 GREGORY STESHENKO, 13 14 15 Plaintiff, v. THOMAS MCKAY, et al. 16 17 18 No. C 09-5543 RS ORDER REVOKING PRIOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL, REFERRING LITIGANT TO FEDERAL PRO BONO PROJECT, AND STAYING PROCEEDINGS PENDING APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL Defendants. ____________________________________/ 19 20 In view of the breakdown in the attorney-client relationship, the appointment of James Dal 21 Bon as counsel for plaintiff Gregory Steshenko is hereby revoked, and Dal Bon is relieved from 22 further representation of Steshenko in this matter. As Steshenko’s prior showing that he satisfies 23 the criteria set forth in the guidelines of the Federal Pro Bono Project remains adequate, and good 24 cause appearing, the Volunteer Legal Services Program of the Pro Bono Project Silicon Valley 25 (“PBPSV”) is requested to attempt to obtain new pro bono counsel for him. All proceedings in this 26 action are hereby stayed until 20 days from the date an attorney is appointed to represent Gregory 27 Steshenko, and all pending hearing dates are vacated. Upon appointment of new counsel, the parties 28 NO. C 09-5543 RS 1 shall engage in meaningful meet and confer negotiations in an attempt to resolve all existing 2 discovery disputes prior to re-noticing or refiling any pending discovery motions. 3 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. 5 6 Dated: 10/25/11 7 8 RICHARD SEEBORG UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 9 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 NO. C 09-5543 RS 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?