Steshenko v. McKay et al

Filing 407

ORDER by Judge Seeborg denying 406 Motion to extend discovery cut-off and requesting filing of consent or declination to jurisdiction of magistrate judge (rslc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/20/2012)

1
2
3
4
5
6

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

8

SAN JOSE DIVISION

9
GREGORY NICHOLAS STESHENKO,

12

No. C 09-5543 RS

Plaintiff,

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

v.

13

THOMAS MCKAY, et al.,

14

Defendants.
____________________________________/

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO
EXTEND DISCOVERY CUT-OFF
AND REQUESTING FILING OF
CONSENT OR DECLINATION TO
JURISDICTION OF MAGISTRATE
JUDGE

15
16

Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-1(b), the College Defendants’ motion for an extension of the

17

discovery cut-off is suitable for disposition without oral argument and the hearing set for August 30,

18

2012 is vacated. The motion is denied on the grounds that the relief sought is wholly unnecessary.

19

A party’s obligation to comply with a timely and properly-served notice of deposition, or other

20

discovery request, and/or a court order compelling a deposition or other discovery, does not

21

terminate upon expiration of a discovery cut-off.

22

Separately, on July 19, 2012, plaintiff filed written consent to the jurisdiction of a magistrate

23

judge to permit reassignment of this action for trial in the San Jose Division. No later than July 27,

24

2012, defendants shall file consents or declinations to such jurisdiction.

25

IT IS SO ORDERED.

26

Dated: July 20, 2012

27
28

RICHARD SEEBORG
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE