Steshenko v. McKay et al
Filing
492
ORDER RE FURTHER PROCEEDINGS. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 10/16/12. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/16/2012)
1
2
3
4
5
6
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
SAN JOSE DIVISION
9
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
14
No. C 09-5543 RS
GREGORY NICHOLAS STESHENKO,
Plaintiff,
ORDER RE FURTHER
PROCEEDINGS
v.
THOMAS MCKAY, et al.,
Defendants.
____________________________________/
15
In light of the Order entered by the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit on October 16,
16
2012, plaintiff is ordered to appear for his deposition at the earliest practicable time, no later than
17
October 31, 2012. The motions hearing and Case Management Conference presently set for
18
November 1, 2012 is vacated. Within 10 days of the completion of plaintiff’s deposition, plaintiff
19
and the two groups of defendants may file statements, not to exceed 5 pages each, setting forth their
20
views as to what motions will remain to be decided in this action and what further briefing, if any
21
will be necessary. As to the issue of potential sanctions against the College Defendants for alleged
22
spoliation of evidence, the briefing schedule set out in the order entered on September 20, 2012
23
remains in effect.
24
25
26
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: 10/16/12
RICHARD SEEBORG
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
27
28
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?