Steshenko v. McKay et al

Filing 492

ORDER RE FURTHER PROCEEDINGS. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 10/16/12. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/16/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 SAN JOSE DIVISION 9 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 13 14 No. C 09-5543 RS GREGORY NICHOLAS STESHENKO, Plaintiff, ORDER RE FURTHER PROCEEDINGS v. THOMAS MCKAY, et al., Defendants. ____________________________________/ 15 In light of the Order entered by the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit on October 16, 16 2012, plaintiff is ordered to appear for his deposition at the earliest practicable time, no later than 17 October 31, 2012. The motions hearing and Case Management Conference presently set for 18 November 1, 2012 is vacated. Within 10 days of the completion of plaintiff’s deposition, plaintiff 19 and the two groups of defendants may file statements, not to exceed 5 pages each, setting forth their 20 views as to what motions will remain to be decided in this action and what further briefing, if any 21 will be necessary. As to the issue of potential sanctions against the College Defendants for alleged 22 spoliation of evidence, the briefing schedule set out in the order entered on September 20, 2012 23 remains in effect. 24 25 26 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: 10/16/12 RICHARD SEEBORG UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 27 28

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?