Steshenko v. McKay et al
Filing
690
ORDER GRANTING LEAVE TO TAKE DEPOSITION UNDER RULE 30(b)(6). Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 5/21/14. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/21/2014)
1
2
3
4
5
6
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
SAN JOSE DIVISION
9
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
GREGORY NICHOLAS STESHENKO,
Plaintiff,
12
13
v.
14
ORDER GRANTING LEAVE TO
TAKE DEPOSITION UNDER RULE
30(b)(6)
THOMAS MCKAY, et al.,
15
No. C 09-5543 RS
Defendants.
____________________________________/
16
17
Plaintiff’s request for leave to request to take a deposition of the College under Rule
18
30(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure is granted. The parties are directed to meet and
19
confer, however, as to appropriate procedures for minimizing the resulting burden to the College.
20
Because the preparation obligations under Rule 30(b)(6) differ from those imposed on other
21
witnesses, and because witnesses not designated to testify under the Rule do not bind the entity,
22
the mere fact that plaintiff will be deposing individuals with knowledge of some or all of the
23
proposed 30(b)(6) topics does not relieve the College of the obligation to provide testimony under
24
the Rule. The parties should discuss, however, designating part or all of the testimony of
25
appropriate percipient witnesses as being provided under the Rule, to avoid duplication and the
26
calling of additional witnesses, if possible. The parties should also attempt to reach stipulations
27
as to the authenticity and characterization of documents as business or public records, to limit or
28
eliminate the need for such testimony.
1
IT IS SO ORDERED.
2
3
4
Dated: 5/21/14
RICHARD SEEBORG
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
5
6
7
8
9
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?