Steshenko v. McKay et al

Filing 690

ORDER GRANTING LEAVE TO TAKE DEPOSITION UNDER RULE 30(b)(6). Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 5/21/14. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/21/2014)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 SAN JOSE DIVISION 9 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 GREGORY NICHOLAS STESHENKO, Plaintiff, 12 13 v. 14 ORDER GRANTING LEAVE TO TAKE DEPOSITION UNDER RULE 30(b)(6) THOMAS MCKAY, et al., 15 No. C 09-5543 RS Defendants. ____________________________________/ 16 17 Plaintiff’s request for leave to request to take a deposition of the College under Rule 18 30(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure is granted. The parties are directed to meet and 19 confer, however, as to appropriate procedures for minimizing the resulting burden to the College. 20 Because the preparation obligations under Rule 30(b)(6) differ from those imposed on other 21 witnesses, and because witnesses not designated to testify under the Rule do not bind the entity, 22 the mere fact that plaintiff will be deposing individuals with knowledge of some or all of the 23 proposed 30(b)(6) topics does not relieve the College of the obligation to provide testimony under 24 the Rule. The parties should discuss, however, designating part or all of the testimony of 25 appropriate percipient witnesses as being provided under the Rule, to avoid duplication and the 26 calling of additional witnesses, if possible. The parties should also attempt to reach stipulations 27 as to the authenticity and characterization of documents as business or public records, to limit or 28 eliminate the need for such testimony. 1 IT IS SO ORDERED. 2 3 4 Dated: 5/21/14 RICHARD SEEBORG UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 5 6 7 8 9 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?