Steshenko v. McKay et al
Filing
882
ORDER CLARIFYING IN LIMINE RULING. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 11/20/14. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/20/2014)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
GREGORY NICHOLAS STESHENKO,
Case No. 09-cv-05543-RS
Plaintiff,
11
United States District Court
Northern District of California
v.
ORDER CLARIFYING IN LIMINE
RULING
12
13
THOMAS MCKAY, et al.,
Defendants.
14
15
16
The order precluding evidence or argument regarding the financial resources of any party
17
does not preclude plaintiff from introducing evidence regarding his unemployment and his claim
18
of resulting emotional distress, to the extent otherwise relevant and admissible. It is improper, and
19
will not be allowed, for a party to use claims of impoverishment, or contentions as to another
20
party’s wealth, to attempt to inflame the passions, prejudices, or sympathy of the jury. This
21
clarification resolves plaintiff’s motion for leave to seek reconsideration, which shall be
22
terminated without further briefing or hearing.
23
24
IT IS SO ORDERED.
25
26
27
28
Dated: November 20, 2014
______________________________________
RICHARD SEEBORG
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?