Steshenko v. McKay et al

Filing 893

ORDER GRANTING-IN-PART MOTION TO COMPEL Signed by Judge Paul S. Grewal on November 24, 2014 re 821 . (psglc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/24/2014)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 SAN JOSE DIVISION United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 11 GREGORY NICHOLAS STESHENKO, Plaintiff, 12 v. 13 14 THOMAS MCKAY, et al., Defendants. 15 16 17 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 5:09-cv-05543-RS ORDER GRANTING-IN-PART MOTION TO COMPEL (Re: Docket No. 821) Plaintiff Gregory Nicholas Steshenko has designated himself as an expert witness as to the technological and scientific principles of the devices he operated in a clinical environment, the 18 procedures he performed in a clinical environment and the condition of electrical engineering 19 20 employment in the United States.1 However, Steshenko refuses to appear for a deposition on his 21 expert opinions unless he is paid an expert witness fee of 200 dollars per hour.2 Steshenko also 22 refuses to supplement his report of his opinions. 23 24 Because he has been identified as an expert whose opinions may be presented at trial, Defendants may depose Steshenko without paying a fee.3 Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(b)(4)(E) requires “a 25 26 1 See Docket No. 785. 27 2 See Docket No. 821 at 2. 28 3 Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(b)(4)(A). 1 Case No. 5:09-cv-05543-RS ORDER GRANTING-IN-PART MOTION TO COMPEL 1 reasonable fee,” but not if “manifest injustice would result.” Because Steshenko is an interested 2 party to this case, it is unjust to require Defendants to pay him any fees. This is especially true 3 given the timing of Steshenko’s disclosure. 4 5 6 But Steshenko need not produce any written summary of the facts and opinions he intends to provide at trial as an expert witness. On balance, the court is persuaded that Defendants can secure whatever additional information about Steshenko’s expert opinions through the deposition 7 8 9 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 11 12 authorized above. SO ORDERED. Dated: November 24, 2014 _________________________________ PAUL S. GREWAL United States Magistrate Judge 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 Case No. 5:09-cv-05543-RS ORDER GRANTING-IN-PART MOTION TO COMPEL

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?