Steshenko v. McKay et al

Filing 921

ORDER VACATING TRIAL DATE AND SETTING FURTHER CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. Further Case Management Conference set for 1/8/2015 01:30 PM in Courtroom 3, 17th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 12/4/14. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/4/2014)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 GREGORY NICHOLAS STESHENKO, Case No. 09-cv-05543-RS Plaintiff, 11 United States District Court Northern District of California v. 12 13 THOMAS MCKAY, et al., ORDER VACATING TRIAL DATE AND SETTING FURTHER CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE Defendants. 14 15 16 Plaintiff represents that he “remains hospitalized in a serious condition” and “would not be 17 able to attend trial” on the date presently scheduled. Plaintiff has not complied with the order to 18 submit a statement from an attending physician. He has, however, provided a statement from a 19 hospital employee describing in general terms his present condition and prognosis. As a result of 20 these circumstances, proceeding with trial on December 8, 2014, does not appear feasible. With 21 reluctance, the trial date is vacated. The parties shall appear on January 8, 2015 for a further Case 22 Management Conference at 1:30 p.m. This order disposes of Docket Nos. 907 and 920. Plaintiff’s 23 motion to impose sanctions or grant summary judgment (Docket No. 913) will be submitted 24 without oral argument, pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-1(b). No motions may be filed between 25 now and the further Case Management Conference. 26 27 28 1 IT IS SO ORDERED. 2 3 4 5 Dated: December 4, 2014 ______________________________________ RICHARD SEEBORG United States District Judge 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 CASE NO. 2 09-cv-05543-RS

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?