Steshenko v. McKay et al
Filing
921
ORDER VACATING TRIAL DATE AND SETTING FURTHER CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. Further Case Management Conference set for 1/8/2015 01:30 PM in Courtroom 3, 17th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 12/4/14. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/4/2014)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
GREGORY NICHOLAS STESHENKO,
Case No. 09-cv-05543-RS
Plaintiff,
11
United States District Court
Northern District of California
v.
12
13
THOMAS MCKAY, et al.,
ORDER VACATING TRIAL DATE AND
SETTING FURTHER CASE
MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
Defendants.
14
15
16
Plaintiff represents that he “remains hospitalized in a serious condition” and “would not be
17
able to attend trial” on the date presently scheduled. Plaintiff has not complied with the order to
18
submit a statement from an attending physician. He has, however, provided a statement from a
19
hospital employee describing in general terms his present condition and prognosis. As a result of
20
these circumstances, proceeding with trial on December 8, 2014, does not appear feasible. With
21
reluctance, the trial date is vacated. The parties shall appear on January 8, 2015 for a further Case
22
Management Conference at 1:30 p.m. This order disposes of Docket Nos. 907 and 920. Plaintiff’s
23
motion to impose sanctions or grant summary judgment (Docket No. 913) will be submitted
24
without oral argument, pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-1(b). No motions may be filed between
25
now and the further Case Management Conference.
26
27
28
1
IT IS SO ORDERED.
2
3
4
5
Dated: December 4, 2014
______________________________________
RICHARD SEEBORG
United States District Judge
6
7
8
9
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
CASE NO.
2
09-cv-05543-RS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?