Artifex Software, Inc. v. Palm. Inc.

Filing 23

STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING DISCOVERY SCHEDULE re 22 . Signed by Judge Jeremy Fogel on 8/18/10. (dlm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/24/2010)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

DARIN W. SNYDER (S.B. #136003) [e-mail] LUANN L. SIMMONS (S.B. #203526) [e-mail] DAVID J. SEPANIK (S.B. #221527) [e-mail] HARRISON A. WHITMAN (S.B. #261008) [e-mail] O'MELVENY & MYERS LLP Two Embarcadero Center, 28th Floor San Francisco, CA 94111-3823 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] Attorneys for Plaintiff Artifex Software Inc. RAGESH K. TANGRI (S.B. #159477) [e-mail] JOSEPH C. GRATZ (S.B. #240676) [e-mail] DURIE TANGRI LLP 217 Leidesdorff Street San Francisco, CA 94111 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] Attorneys for Defendant Palm Inc. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION ARTIFEX SOFTWARE INC., a California corporation, Plaintiff, v. PALM INC., a Delaware corporation, Defendant. Case No. 5:09-cv-05679-JF STIPULATION REGARDING DISCOVERY SCHEDULE

STIPULATION CASE NO. 5:09-CV-05679-JF

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

STIPULATION Plaintiff Artifex Software Inc. ("Artifex"), on the one hand, and defendant Palm Inc. ("Palm") on the other hand, by and through their respective counsel of record, hereby agree and stipulate as follows:

WHEREAS, the parties submitted a proposed case schedule in their joint 26(f) report (Docket No. 18); WHEREAS, the Court adopted the proposed schedule (Docket No. 20); WHEREAS, the parties have been engaged in discussions in an effort to resolve this matter, including participation in an Early Neutral Evaluation pursuant to this Court's ADR Rules; WHEREAS, the parties engaged in only limited discovery during the pendency of their discussions; WHEREAS, the parties are still engaged in discussions in an effort to resolve this matter; NOW THEREFORE, the parties, through their respective counsel of record, agree and stipulate to: (a) extend merits discovery until September 17, 2010; (b) set expert disclosures for October 18, 2010; (c) set expert rebuttal reports for November 16, 2010; (d) set expert discovery cutoff for December 8, 2010; (e) all other dates set in the Court's Order (Docket No. 20) remain the same.

STIPULATION CASE NO. 5:09-CV-05679-JF

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Dated: August 17, 2010

DARIN W. SNYDER O'MELVENY & MYERS, LLP

By:

/s/ Darin W. Snyder Darin W. Snyder Attorneys for Artifex Software Inc. Dated: August 17, 2010 RAGESH K. TANGRI DURIE TANGRI LLP

By:

/s/ Ragesh K. Tangri Ragesh K. Tangri Attorneys for Palm Inc. ATTESTATION Pursuant to General Order No. 45 X(B), I hereby attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from Ragesh K. Tangri. By:__/s/ Darin W. Snyder ________ Darin W. Snyder

8/18/10 DATED: _______________________________ IT IS SO ORDERED. _______________________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

2
STIPULATION CASE NO. 5:09-CV-05679-JF