Artifex Software, Inc. v. Palm. Inc.

Filing 27

STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING DISCOVERY SCHEDULE re 26 . Jury Selection set for 6/10/2011 01:30 PM in Courtroom 3, 5th Floor, San Jose. Jury Trial set for 6/13/2011 09:00 PM in Courtroom 3, 5th Floor, San Jose. Pretrial Conference set for 5/27/2011 11:00 AM in Courtroom 3, 5th Floor, San Jose. Signed by Judge Jeremy Fogel on 10/5/10. (dlm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/12/2010)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

DARIN W. SNYDER (S.B. #136003) [e-mail] LUANN L. SIMMONS (S.B. #203526) [e-mail] DAVID J. SEPANIK (S.B. #221527) [e-mail] HARRISON A. WHITMAN (S.B. #261008) [e-mail] O'MELVENY & MYERS LLP Two Embarcadero Center, 28th Floor San Francisco, CA 94111-3823 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] Attorneys for Plaintiff Artifex Software Inc. RAGESH K. TANGRI (S.B. #159477) [e-mail] JOSEPH C. GRATZ (S.B. #240676) [e-mail] DURIE TANGRI LLP 217 Leidesdorff Street San Francisco, CA 94111 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] Attorneys for Defendant Palm Inc. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION ARTIFEX SOFTWARE INC., a California corporation, Plaintiff, v. PALM INC., a Delaware corporation, Defendant. Case No. 5:09-cv-05679-JF STIPULATION REGARDING DISCOVERY SCHEDULE

STIPULATION CASE NO. 5:09-CV-05679-JF

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 matter;

STIPULATION Plaintiff Artifex Software Inc. ("Artifex"), on the one hand, and defendant Palm Inc. ("Palm") on the other hand, by and through their respective counsel of record, hereby agree and stipulate as follows:

WHEREAS, the parties filed a stipulation to extend discovery on August 17, 2010 (Docket No. 22); WHEREAS, the Court approved of the new schedule on August 24, 2010 (Docket No. 23); WHEREAS, the parties have engaged in repeated discussions in an effort to resolve this

WHEREAS, the parties engaged in only limited discovery during the pendency of their discussions; WHEREAS, the parties are still engaged in discussions in an effort to resolve this matter; NOW THEREFORE, the parties, through their respective counsel of record, request that the Court adjust the case schedule as follows subject to the following requested dates being consistent with the Court's schedule: (a) extend merits discovery until December 17, 2010; (b) set expert disclosures for February 4, 2011; (c) set expert rebuttal reports for March 4, 2011; (d) set expert discovery cutoff for April 15, 2011; (e) set last day to file dispositive motions for April 26, 2011; 27 --(f) set pre-trial conference for May 24, 2011;

STIPULATION CASE NO. 5:09-CV-05679-JF

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

10 (g) commence trial on June -- 2011. 6,

Dated: September 30, 2010

DARIN W. SNYDER O'MELVENY & MYERS, LLP

By:

/s/ Darin W. Snyder Darin W. Snyder Attorneys for Artifex Software Inc. Dated: September 30, 2010 RAGESH K. TANGRI DURIE TANGRI LLP

By:

/s/ Ragesh K. Tangri Ragesh K. Tangri Attorneys for Palm Inc. ATTESTATION Pursuant to General Order No. 45 X(B), I hereby attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from Ragesh K. Tangri. By:__/s/ Darin W. Snyder ________ Darin W. Snyder

10/5/10 DATED: _______________________________ IT IS SO ORDERED. _______________________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

2
STIPULATION CASE NO. 5:09-CV-05679-JF