Artifex Software, Inc. v. Palm. Inc.

Filing 9

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO COMPLAINT re 8 . Signed by Judge Jeremy Fogel on 1/4/10. (dlm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/8/2010)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 DURIE TANGRI LLP Ragesh K Tangri (S.B. #159477) rtangri@durietangri.com Michael H. Page (S.B. #154913) mpage@durietangri.com Joseph C. Gratz (S.B. #240676) jgratz@durietangri.com 217 Leidesdorff Street San Francisco, CA 94111 Tel: (415) 362-6666 / Fax: (415) 236-6300 Attorneys for Defendant PALM, INC. O'MELVENY & MYERS LLP DARIN W. SNYDER (S.B. #136003) dsnyder@omm.com LUANN L. SIMMONS (S.B. #203526) lsimmons@omm.com Two Embarcadero Center, 28th Floor San Francisco, CA 9411-3823 Tel: (415) 984-8700 / Fax: (415) 984-8701 Attorneys for Plaintiff ARTIFEX SOFTWARE INC. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION ARTIFEX SOFTWARE INC., a California corporation, Plaintiff, v. PALM, INC., a Delaware corporation, Defendants. -----------Case No. CV-05679-JF 09-5679-JF STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO -----------------COMPLAINT AND [PROPOSED] ORDER THEREON STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO COMPLAINT AND [PROPOSED] ORDER THEREON CV-05679-JF 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2009; WHEREAS, Defendant's response to Plaintiff's complaint is currently due December 23, WHEREAS, Defendant recently retained counsel and therefore requires additional time to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's complaint; WHEREAS, counsel conferred and agreed that Defendant may extend the time within which to file its response to Plaintiff's complaint; WHEREAS, there have been no previously-requested time modifications in this case; WHEREAS, a 30-day extension of time to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's complaint will not alter the date of any event or any deadline already fixed by Court order; IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the parties hereto, through their respective counsel, as follows: The time for Defendant Palm, Inc. to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's complaint shall be extended 30 days, up to and including January 22, 2010. SO STIPULATED this 23rd day of December, 2009: DURIE TANGRI LLP By: /s/Ragesh K. Tangri Joseph C. Gratz Michael H. Page Ragesh K. Tangri Attorneys for Palm, Inc. O'MELVENY & MYERS LLP By: /s/ Darin W. Snyder Darin W. Snyder Luann L. Simmons Attorneys for Artifex Software Inc. STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO COMPLAINT AND [PROPOSED] ORDER THEREON CV-05679-JF 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: 1/4/10 ATTESTATION Pursuant to General Order No. 45 Section X (B) regarding signature I, Ragesh K. Tangri, attest that concurrence in the filing of this documents has been obtained. By: /s/Ragesh K. Tangri Ragesh K. Tangri By: HONORABLE JEREMY FOGEL UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO COMPLAINT AND [PROPOSED] ORDER THEREON CV-05679-JF 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?