Standiford v. Palm, Inc. et al

Filing 18

STIPULATION AND ORDER to Extend Time for defendant Palm, Inc. and specially appearing defendant Sprint Nextel Corp. to Answer or Otherwise Respond to the Complaint re 14 Stipulation. Signed by Judge James Ware on 2/11/2010. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/11/2010)

1 SHEPPARD, MULLIN, RICHTER & HAMPTON LLP
A Limited Liability Partnership Including Professional Corporations PETER S. HECKER, Cal. Bar No. 66159 3 [e-mail] 4 Embarcadero, 17th Floor 4 San Francisco, California 94111-4109 Telephone: [phone].434.3947 5 Facsimile:

2

UNIT ED

S

S DISTRICT TE C TA

RT U O

GRAN

TED
re

6 SHEPPARD, MULLIN, RICHTER & HAMPTON LLP 7 8 9 10
A Limited Liability Partnership Including Professional Corporations JAMES J. MITTERMILLER, Cal. Bar No. 85177 [e-mail] 501 West Broadway, 19th Floor San Diego, CA 92101-3598 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: 619.234.3815

ER

N

F D IS T IC T O R

11 Attorneys for Defendant PALM, INC. and 12 13 14

Specially Appearing Defendant SPRINT NEXTEL CORP. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN JOSE DIVISION Jason Standiford, an individual, on behalf of

Case No. C09-05719 JW (PVT) [Complaint Filed: Dec. 4, 2009]

15 himself and all others similarly situated, 16 17 v.
SPRINT NEXTEL CORP., a Kansas

Plaintiff,
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME WITHIN WHICH TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT

18 PALM, INC., a Delaware corporation, and 19 corporation and DOES 1 ­ 50, inclusive, 20 21 22 Defendants.

[Northern District L ocal R u le 6-1(a)]
Trial Date: None Set

TO THE HONORABLE COURT AND ALL PARTIES HEREIN AND THEIR

23 ATTORNEYS OF RECORD: 24
Pursuant to Northern District of California Local Rule 6-1(a), plaintiff Jason

25 Standiford, on the one hand, and defendant Palm, Inc. and specially appearing defendant Sprint 26 Nextel Corp. (collectively "defendants") on the other hand, by and through their respective counsel, 27 hereby stipulate and agree that defendants' time within which to answer, move or otherwise plead 28
-1W02-WEST:5PSH1\402438914.2

USDC Case No. C09-05719 JW (PVT)

STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEFENDANTS' TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

A

C

2/11/2010

LI

FO

mes Wa Judge Ja

R NIA

NO

RT

H

1 with respect to the Complaint on file in this action shall be extended to and including 2 February 10, 2010. 3
The parties have not previously stipulated to an extension of defendants' time within

4 which to respond to the Complaint in this action. 5 6 7 Dated: January 29, 2010 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Dated: January 29, 2010 15 16 17 18 19 20 21
ATTESTATION PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 45 By /s/ Peter S. Hecker PETER S. HECKER Attorneys for Defendant PALM, INC. and Specially Appearing Defendant SPRINT NEXTEL CORP. SHEPPARD, MULLIN, RICHTER & HAMPTON LLP By EDELSON McGUIRE, LLC PARISI & HAVENS, LLP THE PARTIES HEREBY SO STIPULATE.

/s/ Michael J. Aschenbrener MICHAEL J. ASCHENBRENER Attorneys for Plaintiff JASON STANDIFORD

22 Pursuant to General Order No. 45 § X(B), I attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has 23 been obtained from each of the other signatories listed above. 24 January 29, 2010 25 26 27 28
-2W02-WEST:5PSH1\402438914.2

By

/s/ Peter S. Hecker PETER S. HECKER

USDC Case No. C09-05719 JW (PVT)

STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEFENDANTS' TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT