Benson v. City of San Jose et al

Filing 25

ORDER granting 24 plaintiff's request for telephonic appearance at 10/12/2010 case management conference. Signed by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd on 10/7/2010. (hrllc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/7/2010)

Download PDF
Benson v. City of San Jose et al Doc. 25 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 NOT FOR CITATION IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION JOHN BENSON, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF SAN JOSE, OFFICER BRIAN PETTIS, and DOES 1-100, Defendants. / No. C09-05772 HRL ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST FOR TELEPHONIC APPEARANCE [Re: Docket No. 24] *E-FILED 10-07-2010* United States District Court 11 For the Northern District of California 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Plaintiff's request for leave to appear by telephone at the October 12, 2010 case management conference is granted. Plaintiff's counsel shall make necessary arrangements to have CourtCall (866-582-6878) initiate the call to the court just prior to the time set for the conference. SO ORDERED. Dated: October 7, 2010 ________________________________ HOWARD R. LLOYD UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 5:09-cv-05772-HRL Notice has been electronically mailed to: Allen Ruby ruby@allenrubylaw.com, bug@allenrubylaw.com cao.main@sanjoseca.gov, richard.north@sanjoseca.gov Richard D. North Counsel are responsible for distributing copies of this document to co-counsel who have not registered for e-filing under the court's CM/ECF program. United States District Court 11 For the Northern District of California 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?