Interserve, Inc. et al v. Fusion Garage PTE. LTD

Filing 106

NOTICE by Fusion Garage PTE. LTD re 102 Reply Memorandum (Doolittle, Patrick) (Filed on 5/3/2010)

1 QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP Claude M. Stern (Bar No. 96737) [e-mail] 2 Patrick Doolittle (Bar No. 203659) [e-mail] 3 50 California Street, 22nd Floor 4 San Francisco, California 94111 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] 5 6 Attorneys for Defendant Fusion Garage PTE. Ltd 7 8 9 10 11 12 INTERSERVE, INC. dba TECHCRUNCH, a Delaware corporation, and CRUNCHPAD, 13 INC., a Delaware corporation, 14 15 vs. Plaintiffs, CASE NO. 09-cv-5812 RS MANUAL FILING NOTIFICATION REGARDING FUSION GARAGE'S REPLY BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF ITS MOTION TO DISMISS, TO STRIKE, AND FOR A MORE DEFINITE STATEMENT Date: May 13, 2010 Time: 1:30 p.m. Judge: Hon. Richard Seeborg UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

16 FUSION GARAGE PTE. LTD, a Singapore company, 17 Defendant. 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
04049.51632/3480793.1

1

Defendant's Reply Brief in Support of its Motion to Dismiss, to Strike, and for a More

2 Definite Statement is being filed in paper form only, and is being maintained in the case file in the 3 Clerk's office. 4 5 If you are a participant in this case, these filings have already been served in hard-copy. For information on retrieving this filing directly from the Court, please see the Court's

6 main web site at http://www.cand.uscourts.gov under Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ). 7 Defendant's Reply Brief in Support of its Motion to Dismiss, to Strike, and for a More

8 Definite Statement was not e-filed because it was submitted under seal. 9 DATED: May 3, 2010 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP

By

/s/ Patrick Doolittle Patrick C. Doolittle Attorneys for Defendant Fusion Garage PTE Ltd.

04049.51632/3480793.1