Interserve, Inc. et al v. Fusion Garage PTE. LTD

Filing 107

Declaration in Support of 76 MOTION to Seal Document 72 Memorandum in Opposition, 73 Declaration in Support, filed byCrunchPad, Inc., Interserve, Inc.. (Related document(s) 76 ) (Scherb, Matthew) (Filed on 5/3/2010)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 101 California Street San Francisco, CA 94111-5802 Andrew P. Bridges (SBN: 122761) ABridges@winston.com David S. Bloch (SBN: 184530) DBloch@winston.com Matthew A. Scherb (SBN: 237461) MScherb@winston.com WINSTON & STRAWN LLP 101 California Street, 39th Floor San Francisco, CA 94111-5802 Telephone: (415) 591-1000 Facsimile: (415) 591-1400 Attorneys for Plaintiffs INTERSERVE, INC., dba TECHCRUNCH and CRUNCHPAD, INC. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Winston & Strawn LLP INTERSERVE, INC., dba TECHCRUNCH, ) a Delaware corporation, and CRUNCHPAD, ) INC., a Delaware corporation, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) vs. ) ) FUSION GARAGE PTE. LTD., a Singapore ) company, ) ) Defendant. ) ) ) Case No. CV-09-5812 RS (PVT) DECLARATION OF DAVID S. BLOCH IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO SEAL (RE DEFENDANT'S PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION OPPOSITION PAPERS) -1DECL. OF D. BLOCH - Case No. 09-CV-5812 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 101 California Street San Francisco, CA 94111-5802 I, David S. Bloch, declare pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1746: 1. I am an attorney at law duly licensed to practice before all the courts of the State of California and before the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. I am a partner at Winston & Strawn LLP, counsel of record for Plaintiffs Interserve, Inc. dba TechCrunch and CrunchPad, Inc. 2. I have reviewed the materials that Defendant includes or discusses in its opposition to Plaintiffs' motion for preliminary injunction, that Defendant seeks to file under seal, and that Plaintiffs have previously designated as "Confidential" or "Highly Confidential" under the Protective Order in the case. 3. The following material should be filed under seal: a. Pages 263 to 272; 281 (lines 16-21); 351 (lines 11-25); and 388 (line 18) to 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 4. Winston & Strawn LLP 390 (line 12) of the transcript of the deposition testimony given by Michael Arrington, the founder, co-editor, and principal of Plaintiff Interserve, Inc. dba TechCrunch and CEO of Plaintiff CrunchPad, Inc., on April 20, 2010, which is Exhibit A to the Declaration of Patrick Doolittle; b. c. Exhibit B to the Declaration of Patrick Doolittle; and Exhibit C to the Declaration of Patrick Doolittle. Mr. Arrington has indicated to me that this material contains highly sensitive information about Plaintiffs' internal operations (including personnel management), Plaintiffs' financials, and Plaintiffs' business plans; and that disclosure of this information would cause Plaintiffs serious competitive harm if openly included or discussed in papers filed publicly with the Court. 5. Plaintiffs provisionally designated under the protective order the entirety of Exhibit A to the Declaration of Patrick Doolittle, the transcript of deposition testimony Mr. Arrington gave on April 20, 2010, to give Plaintiffs time to review all 390 pages of the transcript to make proper designations. Plaintiffs will communicate final designations of the transcript to Defendant on or before May 6, 2010. /// -2DECL. OF D. BLOCH - Case No. 09-CV-5812 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 101 California Street San Francisco, CA 94111-5802 I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on May 3, 2010. /s/ David S. Bloch CONCURRENCE IN FILING David S. Bloch concurs in the filing of this pleading. Dated: May 3, 2010 By: /s/ - Matthew A. Scherb Matthew A. Scherb SF:280912.2 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -3DECL. OF D. BLOCH - Case No. 09-CV-5812 Winston & Strawn LLP

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?