Interserve, Inc. et al v. Fusion Garage PTE. LTD
STIPULATION AND ORDER PURSUANT TO CIVIL L.R. 6-2 TO ENLARGE TIME FOR BRIEFING ON PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO COMPEL DE-DESIGNATION OF DOCUMENTS re 148 Stipulation filed by Fusion Garage PTE. LTD. Signed by Judge Patricia V. Trumbull on June 2, 2010. (pvtlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/2/2010)
Filed06/01/10 Page1 of 3
1 WINSTON & STRAWN, LLP Andrew P. Bridges (Bar No. 122761) 2 ABridges@winston.com David S. Bloch (Bar No. 184530) 3 DBloch@winston.com Matthew A. Scherb (Bar No. 237461) 4 MScherb@winston.com 101 California Street, 39th Floor 5 San Francisco, CA 94111-5802 Telephone: (415) 591-1000 6 Facsimile: (415) 591-1400 7 Attorneys for Plaintiffs Interserve, Inc. dba TechCrunch and CrunchPad, Inc. 8 QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP 9 Claude M. Stern (Bar No. 96737) firstname.lastname@example.org 10 Evette Pennypacker (Bar No. 203515) email@example.com 11 555 Twin Dolphin Dr., 5th floor Redwood Shores, CA 94065 12 Telephone: (650) 801-5000 Facsimile: (650) 801-5100 13 Attorneys for Defendant Fusion Garage PTE 14 Ltd. 15 16 17 18 19 20 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
INTERSERVE, INC. dba TECHCRUNCH, a 21 Delaware corporation, and CRUNCHPAD, INC., a Delaware corporation, 22 Plaintiffs, 23 vs. 24 FUSION GARAGE PTE LTD., a Singapore 25 company, 26 27 28
CASE NO. C 09-cv-5812 RS (PVT)
XXXXXXXXXXXX STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] XX ORDER PURSUANT TO CIVIL L.R. 6-2 TO ENLARGE TIME FOR BRIEFING ON PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO COMPEL DE-DESIGNATION OF DOCUMENTS
Case No. C 09-cv-5812 RS (PVT) STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO ENLARGE TIME FOR BRIEFING
Filed06/01/10 Page2 of 3
WHEREAS, Fusion Garage's counsel seeks a two-day extension for its Opposition Brief to
2 Plaintiffs' Motion to Compel De-Designation of Documents (Dkt. 133) so that it may confer with 3 Fusion Garage further about which documents Fusion Garage wishes to continue to shield as 4 Confidential; 5 WHEREAS, Fusion Garage's counsel conferred with Plaintiffs' counsel about this
6 extension; 7 WHEREAS, Plaintiffs' counsel has no objection to this extension, on the condition that
8 Plaintiffs be entitled to a similar two-day extension on their Reply Brief to this Motion; 9 NOW THEREFORE, IT IS STIPULATED, AGREED AND ORDERED that the deadline
10 for Fusion Garage to submit its Opposition Brief to Plaintiffs' Motion to Compel De-Designation 11 of Documents (Dkt. 133) is extended until June 3, 2010, and the deadline for Plaintiffs to submit 12 their Reply Brief to this Motion is extended until June 10, 2010. The hearing date for Plaintiffs' 13 Motion, June 22, 2010, shall remain unchanged. 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Dated: June 1, 2010 By: /s/ Evette D. Pennypacker Evette D. Pennypacker Dated: June 1, 2010 Dated: June 1, 2010 By: /s/ Evette D. Pennypacker Evette D. Pennypacker Attorneys for Defendant Fusion Garage PTE Ltd. /s/ Matthew A. Scherb Matthew A. Scherb Attorneys for Plaintiffs Interserve, Inc. dba TechCrunch and CrunchPad, Inc.
Pursuant to General Order No. 45, Section X(B) regarding signatures, I attest under penalty of perjury that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from Matthew Scherb.
26 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 27 28
Case No. C 09-cv-5812 RS (PVT) -1STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO ENLARGE TIME FOR BRIEFING
Filed06/01/10 Page3 of 3
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
June 2 DATED: _______________, 2010
Hon. Patricia V. Trumbull United States Magistrate Judge
Case No. C 09-cv-5812 RS (PVT) -2STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO ENLARGE TIME FOR BRIEFING
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?