Interserve, Inc. et al v. Fusion Garage PTE. LTD

Filing 175

Declaration of Patrick C. Doolittle in Support of Memorandum in Opposition to Motion for Preliminary Injunction (Re-filed pursuant to order dated 9/10/2010) filed byFusion Garage PTE. LTD. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C, # 4 Exhibit D, # 5 Exhibit E, # 6 Exhibit F, # 7 Exhibit G)(Doolittle, Patrick) (Filed on 9/16/2010)

Download PDF
Interserve, Inc. et al v. Fusion Garage PTE. LTD Doc. 175 Att. 4 Case3:09-cv-05812-RS Document73-4 Filed04/26/10 Page1 of 7 EXHIBIT D Dockets.Justia.com Case3:09-cv-05812-RS Document73-4 Filed04/26/10 Page2 of 7 1 2 3 4 5 QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART OLIVER & HEDGES, LLP Claude M. Stern (Bar No. 96737) claudestern @quirmemanuel.com Patrick Doolittle (Bar No. 203659) patrickdoolittle @quinnemanuel.com 50 California Street, 22nd Floor San Francisco, California 94111 Telephone: (415) 875-6600 Facsimile: (415) 875-6700 6 Attorneys for Defendant Fusion Garage PTE. Ltd .7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 10 INTERSERVE, INC, dba TECHCRUNCH, a Delaware corporation, and CRUNCHPAD, 12 INC., a Delaware corporation, lI 13 .14 15 16 Defendant. 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 04049.5 1. 632/345"93.1 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN JOSE DIVISION CASE NO.09-cv-5812 RS FUSION GARAGE PTE. LTD' S REVISED NOTICE OF RULE 30(B)(6)-DEPOSITION TO TECHCRUNCH . VS. Plaintiffs, FUSION GARAGE PTE, LTD, a Singapore company, CASE NO.09-ev-5812 RS FUSION GARAGE PTE. LTD.'S REVISED NOTICE OF 30(B)(6 ) DEPOSITION TO INTERSERVE, INC. DBA TECHCRUNCH Case3:09-cv-05812-RS Document73-4 Filed04/26/10 Page3 of 7 1 Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, the Rule 30(b)(6) deposition of Plaintiff 2 Interserve , Inc, dba TechCrunch ("TechCrunch") shall take place on April 20, 2010 at 10:00 a.m., 3 at the offices of Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan , LLP, 555 Twin Dolphin Dr ,, Redwood 4 Shares, California, 94065. Pursuant to Rule 30 (b)(6), TechCrunch shall designate one or more of 5 its officers, directors , managing agents or other persons to testify on its behalf as to matters known 6 or reasonably available to TechCrunch concerning the subjects identified in the attached Schedule 7 A. 8 The deposition will be taken before a notary public or other officer authorized by law to 9 administer oaths, and will be recorded by stenographic and-videographic means . Provisions for 10 real time review via LiveNote or other similar means may also be made available . Said deposition 11 12 13 DATED: April 19, 2010 By: &41W.-4 Patrick C. Doolittle QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP 50 California Street, 22nd Floor San Francisco, California 94111 Telephone : (415) 875-6600 Facsimile:. (415) 875-6700 Attornevs for Defendant Fusion Garage PTE Ltd. shall proceed from day-to- day until complete, Saturdays , Sundays and Holidays excepted . 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 04049.51632 /3458393.1 -2CASE NO.09-ev-5812 RS FUSION GARAGE PTE. LTD.'S REVISED NOTICE OF 30(B)(6) DEPOSITION TO INTERSERVE, INC. DBA TECHCRUNCH Case3:09-cv-05812-RS Document73-4 Filed04/26/10 Page4 of 7 I 2 3 PROOF OF SERVICE 1, Brandi Cheek, declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the following is true and correct: 6 7 8 9 -10 I am employed in the City of San Francisco , County of San Francisco, State of California, 4 in the office of a member of the bar of this court , at whose direction the service was made. I am a resident of the United States, over the age of eighteen ( 18) years, and not a party to or interested in 5 the within-entitled action . My business address is Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP, at 50 California Street, 22nd Floor, San Francisco , CA 9411 i.. I caused to be served the following document(s): FUSION GARAGE PTE. LTD ' s REVISED NOTICE OF RULE 30(B)(6) DEPOSITION TO TECHCRUNCH 1 caused the above documents to be served on each person on the attached list by the following means: [X] 1 enclosed true and correct copies of said documents in an envelope, and consigned it for hand delivery via messenger on April 19, 2010. (Indicated on the attached address list by an [H) next to the address.) 11 12 1 am readily familiar with my firm's practice for collection and processing of correspondence for delivery in the manner indicated above, to wit, that correspondence will be deposited for collection in the above-described manner this same day in the ordinary course of 14 business. 13 15 16 0 17 Brandi Cheek Executed on April 19, 2010, at San Franciscoifor. 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 09049.5163213458393,E CASE NO.09-cv5812 RS -3FUSION GARAGE PTE. LTD.`S REVISED NOTICE OF 30(B)(6 ) DEPOSITION TO INTERSERVE, INC. DBA TECHCRUNCH Case3:09-cv-05812-RS Document73-4 Filed04/26/10 Page5 of 7 I 2 3 4 5 SERVICE LIST Key: [E] Delivery by E-Mail [H] Delivery by Hand Service [FD] Delivery by Federal Express [E/FD] Delivery by E-Mail and Federal Express [M] Delivery by Mail [E/M] Delivery by E-Mail and Mail [H] David Bloch Winston & Strawn LLP 101 California Street 39th Floor San Francisco, CA 94111-5802 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16. 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 04049.51632/3458393.1 CASE NO.09-cv-5812 RS 4FUSION.GARAGE PTE. LTD.'S REVISED NOTICE OF 30(B)(6) DEPOSITION TO INTERSERVE, INC. DBA TECHCRUNCH Case3:09-cv-05812-RS Document73-4 Filed04/26/10 Page6 of 7 SCHEDULE A 2 DEFINITIONS 1. "YOU", "YOUR", or "TECHCRUNCH " means Plaintiff Interserve, Inc., d/b/a 3 4 TechCrunch, and any person acting under its direction or on its behalf, including its employees, 5 agents, and attorneys. 2. "FUSION GARAGE" or "DEFENDANT" means Defendant Fusion Garage PTE. 6 7 Ltd., and any person acting under its direction or on its behalf, including its employees, agents, 8 and attorneys. 3. "CP INC." means Plaintiff CrunchPad, Inc., and any person acting under its direction or on its behalf, including its employees, agents, and attorneys. 4. "CRUNCHPAD" means the CrunchPad web tablet computer alleged in YOUR complaint, including any of its prototypes or versions. 5. or versions. "JOOJOO" means the JooJoo web tablet computer, including any of its prototypes TOPICS FOR RULE 30(b )(6) DEPOSITION 17 1. YOUR contention that FUSION GARAGE may dissipate its assets absent a i 18 preliminary injunction. 19 2. YOUR contention that FUSION GARAGE is a financially insecure start-up 20 company funded mostly by loans at confiscatory rates. 21 22 23 3. YOUR contention. that a partnership or joint venture existed between YOU and. i FUSION GARAGE. 4. Any merger or acquisition discussions between or amongst YOU, FUSION 24 GARAGE, and CP INC. 25 5. All instances in which YOU allegedly loaned money to FUSION GARAGE or. 26 advanced money to FUSION GARAGE. 27 28 04049.516326458393.1 6. 7. Any investments YOU allegedly made in FUSION GARAGE. Any funding YOU secured for the development of the CRUNCHPAD. CASE NO. 09-av-5812 RS FUSION GARAGE PTE. LTD: S REVISED NOTICE OF 30(B)(6) DEPOSITION TO INTERSERVE, INC. DBA TECHCRUNCH. Case3:09-cv-05812-RS Document73-4 Filed04/26/10 Page7 of 7 8. YOUR alleged hosting of FUSION GARAGE personnel at YOUR headquarters in California, as described in Paragraphs 33 and 35 of the Complaint. 9. Complaint. 10. Any alleged contributions YOU made to the hardware, software, design, or other YOUR alleged threats to "turn the project off," as described in Paragraph 28 of the aspects of the CRUNCHPAD. 7 11. Any alleged contributions YOU made to the hardware, software, design, or other 8 aspects of the JOOJOO. 9 12. . Any alleged ownership right YOU claim to have in any intellectual property 10 relating to the CRUNCHPAD. 11 13. Any alleged ownership right YOU have in any intellectual property relating to the 12 JOOJOO. 13 14 YOU. 15 14. Any allegedly fraudulent statements YOU contend FUSION GARAGE made about 15. All instances of false advertising that YOU contend FUSION GARAGE 16 committed. .17 18 19 20 .21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 04049.51632/3458393, 1. 11 CASE NO. 09-cy5812 RS FUSION GARAGE PTE. LTD.'S REVISED NOTICE OF 30(8)(6) DEPOSITION TO 1NTERSERVE, INC. DBA TECHCRUNCH

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?