Interserve, Inc. et al v. Fusion Garage PTE. LTD

Filing 186

Certificate of Interested Entities by CrunchPad, Inc., Interserve, Inc. (Amended) (Scherb, Matthew) (Filed on 10/14/2010)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 101 California Street San Francisco, CA 94111-5802 Andrew P. Bridges (SBN: 122761) ABridges@winston.com David S. Bloch (SBN: 184530) DBloch@winston.com Matthew Scherb (SBN: 237461) MScherb@winston.com WINSTON & STRAWN LLP 101 California Street San Francisco, CA 94111-5802 Telephone: (415) 591-1000 Facsimile: (415) 591-1400 Attorneys for Plaintiffs TECHCRUNCH, INC. and CRUNCHPAD, INC. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION TECHCRUNCH, INC., a Delaware corporation, ) and CRUNCHPAD, INC., a Delaware ) corporation, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) vs. ) ) FUSION GARAGE PTE. LTD., a Singapore ) company, ) ) Defendant. ) ) Case No. C 09-cv-5812 RS (PVT) 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Winston & Strawn LLP PLAINTIFFS' AMENDED CERTIFICATION OF INTERESTED ENTITIES OR PERSONS PURSUANT TO LOCAL CIVIL RULE 3-16 AOL Inc. recently acquired Plaintiff TechCrunch, Inc. (formerly known as Interserve, Inc.). Accordingly, pursuant to Civil L.R. 3-16, the undersigned certifies that the following listed persons, associations of persons, firms, partnerships, corporations (including parent corporations) or other entities now (i) have a financial interest in the subject matter in controversy or in a party to the proceeding, or (ii) have a non-financial interest in that subject matter or in a party that could be substantially affected by the outcome of this proceeding: AOL Inc. Dated: October 14, 2010 By: WINSTON & STRAWN LLP / s/ Andrew P. Bridges David S. Bloch Matthew A. Scherb Attorneys for Plaintiffs 1 SF:293065.2 PLAINTIFFS' AMENDED CERT. OF INTERESTED ENTITIES OR PERSONS ­ Case No. 09-5812 RS(PVT)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?