Interserve, Inc. et al v. Fusion Garage PTE. LTD

Filing 196

STIPULATION & [Proposed] Order to Continue Case Management Conference by CrunchPad, Inc., Fusion Garage PTE. LTD, Interserve, Inc.. (Watson, Thomas) (Filed on 3/9/2011)

Interserve, Inc. et al v. Fusion Garage PTE. LTD

Doc. 196

1 QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP Claude M. Stern (Bar No. 96737) 2 [e-mail] Evette Pennypacker (Bar No. 203515) 3 [e-mail] Thomas R. Watson (Bar No. 227264) 4 [e-mail] 555 Twin Dolphin Dr., 5th floor 5 Redwood Shores, CA 94065 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] 7 Joshua L. Sohn (Bar No. 250105) 50 California Street, 22nd Floor 8 San Francisco, CA 94111 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] 10 Attorneys for Defendant Fusion Garage PTE Ltd. 11 WINSTON & STRAWN LLP Andrew P. Bridges (Bar No.: 122761) 12 [e-mail] David S. Bloch (SBN: 184530) 13 [e-mail] Matthew A. Scherb (Bar No. 237461) 14 [e-mail] WINSTON & STRAWN LLP 15 101 California Street, 39th Floor San Francisco, CA 94111-5802 16 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] 17 Attorneys for Plaintiffs TechCrunch, Inc., et al. 18 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 19 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 20 TECHCRUNCH, INC. a Delaware CASE NO. 09-cv-5812 RS (PSG) 21 corporation, and CRUNCHPAD, INC., a Delaware corporation, JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 22 ORDER CONTINUING CASE Plaintiffs, MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE 23 vs. 24 FUSION GARAGE PTE. LTD, a Singapore 25 company, 26 27 28
04049.51632/4003049.1

Defendant.

Case No. 09-cv-5812 RS (PSG) JOINT STIPULATION & [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
Dockets.Justia.com

1

Pursuant to Local Rule 6-2 and 16-2(e), Plaintiffs TechCrunch, Inc. and CrunchPad, Inc.

2 (collectively, "Plaintiffs"), and Defendant Fusion Garage PTE, Ltd. ("Defendant"), by and through 3 their respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate to continue the Initial Case Management 4 Conference scheduled for March 17, 2011. 5 6 1. Reason for the Request

The Court denied Defendant's Motion to Dismiss the Amended Complaint on February 9,

7 2011 and, at the same time, set an Initial Case Management Conference for March 17, 2011. See 8 Dkt. 194. However, lead counsel for Defendant Fusion Garage is currently scheduled to argue 9 motions for summary judgment on March 17, 2011 in the case captioned Bedrock Computer 10 Technologies, LLC v. Softlayer Technologies, Inc. et al., 6:09-cv-00269-LED­JDL (E.D. Tex.). 11 As a result, the parties have agreed to request a continuation of the Initial Case Management

12 Conference in this matter until March 31, 2011. 13 The parties will file a Case Management Conference statement and its ADR certifications by

14 March 24, 2011. 15 16 2. Prior Time Modifications

The following time modifications have been previously made in this case: time to file a

17 responsive pleading (Dkt. No. 16); motion to set the hearing dates on Fusion Garage's motion to 18 dismiss, to strike, and for a more definite statement ("motion to dismiss") and Plaintiffs' motion for 19 a preliminary injunction to May, 6, 2010 (Dkt. No. 45); motion to shorten time to hear Fusion 20 Garage's motion to compel documents to support its opposition to Plaintiffs' Motion for a 21 preliminary injunction (Dkt. No. 55); setting new hearing date on Plaintiffs' motion for a 22 preliminary injunction and defendant's motion to dismiss (Dkt. 64); granting extension of time 23 regarding briefing on Plaintiffs' motion to compel (Dkt. 178); and granting a brief extension of time 24 to comply with an order compelling the production of redacted source code (Dkt. 188). 25 26 27 28
04049.51632/4003049.1

3.

Effect of Requested Modification

The requested modification will have no effect on the rest of the schedule in this action. So Stipulated.

Case No. 09-cv-5812 RS (PSG) -2JOINT STIPULATION & [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

1

NOW, THEREFORE, the parties to this action, through their respective counsel of record,

2 AGREE AND HEREBY STIPULATE, if agreeable to the Court, to continue the Initial Case 3 Management Conference until March 31, 2011 at 10:00 a.m. The parties will submit a Case 4 Management Conference Statement and their ADR certifications by March 24, 2010. 5 6 IT IS SO STIPULATED. QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP

7 Dated: March 9, 2011 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
04049.51632/4003049.1

By /s/ Thomas R. Watson Thomas R. Watson Attorneys for Defendant Fusion Garage PTE., Ltd.

DATED: March 9, 2011

WINSTON & STRAWN LLP

By /s/ Matthew A. Scherb Matthew A. Scherb Attorneys for Plaintiffs TechCrunch, Inc. and CrunchPad, Inc.

Pursuant to stipulation, it is SO ORDERED.

DATED: March

, 2011

HON. RICHARD SEEBORG UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

Case No. 09-cv-5812 RS (PSG) -3JOINT STIPULATION & [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

1 2

FILER'S ATTESTATION Pursuant to General Order No. 45, Section X(B) regarding signatures, I attest that I

3 have obtained concurrence in the filing of this document from Matthew A. Scherb, counsel for 4 Plaintiffs. 5 DATED: March 9, 2011 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
04049.51632/4003049.1

By:

/s/ Thomas R. Watson Thomas R. Watson

Case No. 09-cv-5812 RS (PSG) -4JOINT STIPULATION & [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE