Interserve, Inc. et al v. Fusion Garage PTE. LTD

Filing 201

NOTICE of need for ADR Phone Conference (ADR L.R. 3-5 d) submitted jointly (Scherb, Matthew) (Filed on 3/24/2011)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA TECHCRUNCH, INC. and CRUNCHPAD, INC. CASE NO. C 09-cv-5812 RS (PSG) Plaintiff(s), v. FUSION GARAGE PTE. LTD., NOTICE OF NEED FOR ADR PHONE CONFERENCE Defendant(s). ____________________________________/ Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and that they: 9 have not yet reached an agreement to an ADR process request an Early Settlement Conference with a Magistrate Judge 9 March 31, 2011 Date of Case Management Conference ___________________ The following counsel will participate in the ADR phone conference: Name Andrew P. Bridges Party Representing Phone No. E-Mail Address Plaintiffs and Counterclaim-defendant (415) 591-1000 ___________________________________________________________________________ Claude M. Stern, Defendant and Counterclaimant (650) 801-5000, ___________________________________________________________________________ Evette D. Pennypacker,, Thomas R. Watson ___________________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________________ Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR Local Rule 3-5 require that lead trial counsel participate in a telephone conference with a member of the ADR Legal Staff before the Case Management Conference. The ADR Unit ( will notify you of the date and time of your phone conference. 3/24/2011 Dated:___________ /s/ Matthew A. Scherb ______________________ Attorney for Plaintiff 3/24/2011 Dated:____________ Rev 12.05 /s/ Thomas R. Watson ______________________ Attorney for Defendant When filing this document in ECF, please be sure to use the ADR Docket Event entitled "Notice of Need for ADR Phone Conference (ADR L.R. 3-5 d)."

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?