Interserve, Inc. et al v. Fusion Garage PTE. LTD

Filing 36

Minute Entry: Motion Hearing held on 3/16/2010 before Judge Patricia V. Trumbull (Date Filed: 3/16/2010) re 23 MOTION for Protective Order Pending Plaintiff's Identification of its Allegedly Misappropriated Trade Secrets; Memorandum of Points and Authorities filed by Fusion Garage PTE. LTD. The matter is taken under submission. (Court Reporter Gina Galvan Colin.) (mpb, COURT STAFF) (Date Filed: 3/16/2010)

Interserve, Inc. et al v. Fusion Garage PTE. LTD

Doc. 36

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Lester L. Levy (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) Michele F. Raphael (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) WOLF POPPER LLP 845 Third Avenue New York NY 10022 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: 212.486.2093 e-mail: [e-mail] e-mail: [e-mail] William M. Audet (SBN 117456) Ryan M. Hagan, Esq. (SBN 200850) ALEXANDER, HAWES & AUDET, LLP 152 North Third Street, Suite 600 San Jose, CA 95112 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: 408.287.1776 e-mail: [e-mail] e-mail: [e-mail] Attorneys for Plaintiffs and the Proposed Class UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION CLRB HANSON INDUSTRIES, LLC d/b/a INDUSTRIAL PRINTING, and HOWARD STERN, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, vs. GOOGLE, INC., Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO: C05-03649 JW [PROPOSED] ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT GOOGLE, INC.'S MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS' UNJUST ENRICHMENT CLAIM Date: March 13, 2006 Time: 9:00 a.m. Place: Courtroom 8 Judge: Honorable James Ware

[Proposed] Order Denying Defendant Google, Inc.'s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Unjust Enrichment Claim Case No: C05-03649 JW
Doc. 151519

Dockets.Justia.com

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Defendant Google, Inc.'s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Unjust Enrichment Claim, brought pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6), having come on for hearing, the Court having considered all relevant documents and evidence and having considered the arguments of counsel, and good cause appearing therefor: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Unjust Enrichment Claim is denied. Dated: ___________________, 2006 _________________________________________ Honorable James Ware U.S.D.C., Northern District of California

Respectfully submitted: WOLF POPPER LLP

By: /s/ Michele F. Raphael Michele F. Raphael Attorneys for Plaintiffs and the Proposed Class

[Proposed] Order Denying Defendant Google, Inc.'s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Unjust Enrichment Claim Case No: C05-03649 JW
Doc. 151519

2