Interserve, Inc. et al v. Fusion Garage PTE. LTD

Filing 45

ORDER RE: 40 and 42 GRANTING FUSION GARAGE'S MOTION TO CHANGE HEARING DATE TO 5/6/10 AT 1:30 P.M. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 4/1/10.(cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/1/2010)

*E-Filed 4/1/10*

1 QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART OLIVER & HEDGES, LLP Claude M. Stern (Bar No. 96737) 2 [e-mail] Patrick Doolittle (Bar No. 203659) 3 [e-mail] 50 California Street, 22nd Floor 4 San Francisco, California 94111 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] 6 Attorneys for Defendant Fusion Garage PTE. Ltd 7 8 9 10 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION CASE NO. 09-cv-5812 RS [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING FUSION GARAGE'S MOTION FOR ADMINISTRATIVE RELIEF OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, MOTION TO CHANGE TIME, AS MODIFIED BY THE COURT

12 INTERSERVE, INC. dba TECHCRUNCH, a Delaware corporation, and CRUNCHPAD, 13 INC., a Delaware corporation, 14 15 vs. Plaintiffs,

16 FUSION GARAGE PTE. LTD, a Singapore company, 17 Defendant. 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
04049.51632/3412394.1

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION CASE NO. 09-CV-5812 RGS

1

Defendant Fusion Garage PTE Ltd. ("Fusion Garage") has filed an administrative motion

2 to set the hearing dates on its Motion to Dismiss, to Strike, and for a More Definite Statement 3 ("Motion to Dismiss") and Plaintiffs' Motion for a Preliminary Injunction ("PI Motion") for May 4 6, 2010, or another later date that is convenient for the Court's calendar. After reviewing the 5 parties' submissions, Fusion Garage's motion is GRANTED. The hearing date on the Motion to 6 Dismiss and PI Motion is reset to May 6, 2010. Briefing on both motions to proceed per L.R. 7. 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
04049.51632/3412394.1

The amended request for a longer continuance is DENIED. IT IS SO ORDERED.

SO ORDERED this 1st day of April, 2010.

___________________________________ THE HONORABLE RICHARD SEEBORG UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION CASE NO. 09-CV-5812 RGS

1