Interserve, Inc. et al v. Fusion Garage PTE. LTD

Filing 50

RE-NOTICE by Fusion Garage PTE. LTD re 47 First MOTION to Compel Documents (Doolittle, Patrick) (Filed on 4/5/2010) Modified on 4/6/2010 (slh, COURT STAFF).

1 QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP Claude M. Stern (Bar No. 96737) 2 [e-mail] Patrick Doolittle (Bar No. 203659) 3 [e-mail] 50 California Street, 22nd Floor 4 San Francisco, California 94111 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] 6 Attorneys for Defendant Fusion Garage PTE Ltd. 7 8 9 10 11 INTERSERVE, INC. dba TECHCRUNCH, a Delaware corporation, and CRUNCHPAD, 12 INC., a Delaware corporation, 13 14 vs. Plaintiffs, CASE NO. C 09-cv-5812 RS (PVT) FUSION GARAGE'S RE-NOTICE OF MOTION TO COMPEL PLAINTIFFS' COMPLIANCE WITH THEIR RESPONSES TO REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION Date: May 11, 2010 Time: 10:00 a.m. Judge: Hon. Patricia Trumbull UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

15 FUSION GARAGE PTE LTD., a Singapore company, 16 Defendant. 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
04049.51632/3420977.1

Case No. C 09-cv-5812 RS RE-NOTICE OF MOTION TO COMPEL

1 2

RE-NOTICE OF MOTION Please take notice that on May 11, 2010, at 10:00 a.m. in the Courtroom of the Honorable

3 Patricia Trumbull of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, San 4 Jose Division, 280 South 1st Street, San Jose, California, 95113, Defendant Fusion Garage PTE, 5 Ltd. ("Fusion Garage") will, and hereby does, move to compel Plaintiffs to comply with their 6 responses to Fusion Garage's Requests for Production and produce all non-privileged responsive 7 documents. 8 Please take further notice that Fusion Garage seeks to have this motion heard on shortened

9 time, preferably on Wednesday, April 7, 2010. The Court has not yet ruled on Fusion Garage's 10 request that the Motion to Compel be heard on shortened time. 11 The bases for the motion are that (1) Plaintiffs have filed a Motion for a Preliminary

12 Injunction that is set to be heard on May 6, 2010 with Fusion Garage's opposition due less than 13 two weeks from now; (2) Plaintiffs have responded to Fusion Garage's outstanding document 14 requests by committing to produce documents; but (3) Plaintiffs have only produced a small 15 number of documents to date. 16 The motion is based on this Re-Notice of Motion, the original Notice of Motion, Motion,

17 and Memorandum of Points and Authorities (Dkt. 47), the pleadings in this action, the Declaration 18 of Patrick Doolittle (Dkt. 48), and such other matters and argument as the Court may consider at 19 the time of the hearing hereon. 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
04049.51632/3420977.1

RE-NOTICE OF MOTION TO COMPEL

-1-

Case No. C 09-cv-5812 RS

1 2 DATED: April 5, 2010 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
04049.51632/3420977.1

QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP

By

/s/ Patrick Doolittle Patrick C. Doolittle Attorneys for Defendant Fusion Garage PTE Ltd.

RE-NOTICE OF MOTION TO COMPEL

-1-

Case No. C 09-cv-5812 RS