Interserve, Inc. et al v. Fusion Garage PTE. LTD

Filing 70

MOTION to Shorten Time on its Motion to Remove Confidentiality Designation filed by Fusion Garage PTE. LTD. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Doolittle, Patrick) (Filed on 4/23/2010)

1 QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP Claude M. Stern (Bar No. 96737) 2 [e-mail] Patrick Doolittle (Bar No. 203659) 3 [e-mail] 50 California Street, 22nd Floor 4 San Francisco, California 94111 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] 6 Attorneys for Defendant Fusion Garage PTE Ltd. 7 8 9 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION CASE NO. C 09-cv-5812 RS (PVT) FUSION GARAGE'S MOTION TO SHORTEN TIME ON ITS MOTION TO REMOVE CONFIDENTIALITY DESIGNATION FROM TECHCRUNCH 30(B)(6) TRANSCRIPT (CIV L.R. 6-3)

11 INTERSERVE, INC. dba TECHCRUNCH, a Delaware corporation, and CRUNCHPAD, 12 INC., a Delaware corporation, 13 14 vs. Plaintiffs,

15 FUSION GARAGE PTE LTD., a Singapore company, 16 Defendant. 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
04049.51632/3465999.1

Case No. 09-cv-5812 RS FUSION GARAGE'S MOTION TO SHORTEN TIME

1 2

MOTION TO SHORTEN TIME Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-3, Defendant Fusion Garage PTE., Ltd. ("Fusion Garage")

3 respectfully requests that the Court hear Fusion Garage's Motion to Remove Confidentiality 4 Designation on shortened time. The Motion to Remove Confidentiality Designation requires 5 urgent action because maintaining a blanket Attorneys' Eyes Only (AEO) designation over the 6 Deposition Transcript would prejudice Fusion Garage's ability to prepare for the May 13, 2010 7 hearing on Plaintiffs' Motion for Preliminary Injunction. To prepare for the preliminary 8 injunction hearing, Fusion Garage's attorneys want to share portions of the Deposition Transcript 9 with Fusion Garage's CEO. Moreover, the AEO designation would inhibit Fusion Garage's 10 counsel's ability to discuss the designated testimony at the preliminary injunction hearing itself. 11 Finally, Fusion Garage wants its brief in opposition to the preliminary injunction motion to be 12 filed in the public record. Accordingly, Fusion Garage's counsel respectfully requests that the 13 Motion to Remove Confidentiality Designation be heard on or before May 4, 2010. 14 In accordance with the declaration requirement of Local Rule 6-3, Fusion Garage

15 respectfully refers the Court to the Declaration of Patrick C. Doolittle in support of Fusion 16 Garage's Motion to Remove Confidentiality Designation. 17 18 19 DATED: April 23, 2010 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
04049.51632/3465999.1

Respectfully submitted, QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP

By

/s/ Patrick Doolittle Patrick C. Doolittle Attorneys for Defendant Fusion Garage PTE Ltd.

FUSION GARAGE'S MOTION TO SHORTEN TIME

-1-

Case No. 09-cv-5812 RS