Interserve, Inc. et al v. Fusion Garage PTE. LTD

Filing 76

MOTION to Seal Document 72 Memorandum in Opposition, 73 Declaration in Support, filed by Fusion Garage PTE. LTD. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Doolittle, Patrick) (Filed on 4/26/2010)

Download PDF
1 QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART OLIVER & HEDGES, LLP Claude M. Stern (Bar No. 96737) 2 claudestern@quinnemanuel.com Patrick Doolittle (Bar No. 203659) 3 patrickdoolittle@quinnemanuel.com 50 California Street, 22nd Floor 4 San Francisco, California 94111 Telephone: (415) 875-6600 5 Facsimile: (415) 875-6700 6 Attorneys for Defendant Fusion Garage PTE. Ltd 7 8 9 10 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION CASE NO. 09-cv-5812 RS [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING FUSION GARAGE'S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO SEAL 12 INTERSERVE, INC. dba TECHCRUNCH, a Delaware corporation, and CRUNCHPAD, 13 INC., a Delaware corporation, 14 15 vs. Plaintiffs, 16 FUSION GARAGE PTE. LTD, a Singapore company, 17 Defendant. 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 04049.51632/3469291.1 [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION CASE NO. 09-CV-5812 RS 1 Defendant Fusion Garage PTE Ltd. ("Fusion Garage") has filed an administrative motion 2 to provisionally file under seal its Opposition Brief to Plaintiffs' Motion for Preliminary 3 Injunction and Exhibits A, B, and C of the Declaration of Patrick C. Doolittle in support of that 4 Opposition Brief. After reviewing the parties' submissions, Fusion Garage's motion is 5 GRANTED. The aforementioned documents shall be filed under seal. 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 04049.51632/3469291.1 IT IS SO ORDERED. SO ORDERED this ______ day of _______________, 2010. _____________________________________ THE HONORABLE RICHARD SEEBORG UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION CASE NO. 09-CV-5812 RS 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?