Rasheed v. Attorney General et al

Filing 3

ORDER DISMISSING CASE. Signed by Judge Jeremy Fogel on 1/28/10. (dlm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/28/2010)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 NOT FOR CITATION IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA United United States District Court 11 For the Northern District of California 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 TAHEE A. RASHEED, Plaintiff, vs. ATTORNEY GENERAL, et al., Defendant(s). ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. C 09-05866 JF (PR) ORDER OF DISMISSAL Plaintiff, a state prisoner, filed a civil rights complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983. On January 14, 2010, Plaintiff notified the Court that the complaint is a duplicate of one previously filed under case number C 09-05793 JF (PR), which is currently pending in this Court. Plaintiff states that the complaint was mailed by mistake. (See C 09-05793 JF (PR), Docket No. 5.) Accordingly, Plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED as duplicative . The Clerk shall terminate all pending motions as moot. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: 1/28/10 JEREMY FOGEL United States District Judge Order of Dismissal P:\PRO-SE\SJ.JF\CR.09\Rasheed05866_dism-dupl.wpd UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA TAHEE ABDULLAH RASHEED, Plaintiff, v. ATTORNEY GENERAL, et al., Defendants. / Case Number: CV09-05866 JF CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am an employee in the Office of the Clerk, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California. 1/28/10 , I SERVED a true and correct copy(ies) of the That on attached, by placing said copy(ies) in a postage paid envelope addressed to the person(s) hereinafter listed, by depositing said envelope in the U.S. Mail, or by placing said copy(ies) into an inter-office delivery receptacle located in the Clerk's office. Tahee Abdullah Rasheed J74120 Folsom State Prison Represa, CA 95671-0066 Dated: 1/28/10 Richard W. Wieking, Clerk

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?