Baba v. Hewlett Packard Company

Filing 46

ORDER RE 45 SETTING DEFENDANT HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY'S TIME TO ANSWER, MOVE OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO THE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT AND SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 7/20/10. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/20/2010)

Baba v. Hewlett Packard Company

Doc. 46

*E-Filed 7/20/10* 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 v. HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY, a Delaware corporation, Defendant. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION DAVID BABA and RAY RITZ, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, Case No. 09-05946-RS [PROPOSED] ORDER SETTING DEFENDANT HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY'S TIME TO ANSWER, MOVE OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO THE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT AND SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE Before: Hon. Richard Seeborg SAMUEL LIVERSIDGE (SBN 180578) GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP 333 South Grand Avenue Los Angeles, CA 90071 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: 213.229.6420 E-mail: [e-mail] KRISTOFOR T. HENNING (PAB 85047) (pro hac vice) KATE A. STANLEY (PAB 204188) (pro hac vice) MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP 1701 Market Street Philadelphia, PA 19103 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: 215.963.5001 E-mail: [e-mail] E-mail: [e-mail] Attorneys for Defendant HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY SCOTT R. KAUFMAN (SBN 190129) 1400 Coleman Ave., Suite F-26 Santa Clara, CA 95050 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: 408.727.8883 E-mail: [e-mail] BARBARA QUINN SMITH (OHB 0055328) (pro hac vice) MADDOX HARGETT & CARUSO 9853 Johnnycake Ridge Road, Suite 302 Mentor, OH 44060 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: 440-848-8175 T. JOHN KIRK (INB 27202-29) (Pro Hac Vice) THOMAS K. CARDWELL (INB 16001-49) (pro hac vice) MADDOX HARGETT & CARUSO 10100 Lantern Road, Suit 150 Fishers, IN 46038 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: 317-598-2050 Attorneys for Plaintiffs DAVID BABA and RAY RITZ

Case No. 09-05946-RS ­ [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME

1
Dockets.Justia.com

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

PURSUANT TO THE TERMS OF THE STIPULATION filed by the parties on July 19, 2010, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant Hewlett-Packard Company ("HP") will have until August 26, 2010 to answer, move or otherwise respond to the Second Amended Complaint. Named Plaintiffs shall have until October 7, 2010 to file a Response to HP's anticipated motion to dismiss and HP shall have until October 28, 2010 to file a Reply. 20 Dated: July ___, 2010 Richard Seeborg United States District Judge

Case No. 09-05946-RS ­ [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME

2