Spilsbury v. Target Corporation et al

Filing 119

ORDER GRANTING 118 Plaintiff's Request for Reconsideration and Resetting Third Party's Motion to Quash. The Court will hear Spilsbury, Sr.'s motion to quash 99 on April 5, 2011 at 10:00 a.m., and briefing shall proceed in accordance with Civil Local Rule 7-3. In addition, compliance with the subpoena at issue is stayed pending resolution of Spilsbury, Sr.'s motion. Signed by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd on 3/2/2011. (hrllc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/2/2011)

Spilsbury v. Target Corporation et al

Doc. 119

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

** E-filed March 2, 2011 **

NOT FOR CITATION IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION THOMAS SPILSBURY, Plaintiff, v. TARGET CORP., et al., [Re: Docket Nos. 99, 117, 118] Defendants. ____________________________________/ On February 28, 2011, this Court denied without prejudice five discovery motions recently filed in this case. Docket No. 117 (denying Docket Nos. 95, 99, 103, 112, 115). Later that day, Plaintiff requested that the Court reconsider its decision with respect to the motion to quash filed by third party Thomas Spilsbury, Sr. ("Spilsbury, Sr."). Docket Nos. 99, 118. Upon review of Plaintiff's submission, the Court GRANTS the request. The Court will hear Spilsbury, Sr.'s motion to quash on April 5, 2011 at 10:00 a.m., and briefing shall proceed in accordance with Civil Local Rule 7-3. In addition, compliance with the subpoena at issue is stayed pending resolution of Spilsbury, Sr.'s motion. No. C09-05955 JW (HRL) ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION AND RESETTING THIRD PARTY'S MOTION TO QUASH

United States District Court

11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

For the Northern District of California

IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: March 2, 2011 HOWARD R. LLOYD
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Dockets.Justia.com

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

C09-05955 JW (HRL) Notice will be electronically mailed to: Juliet MacMillin Lompa Timothy Dennis McMahon [e-mail], [e-mail] [e-mail], [e-mail], [e-mail]

Please see General Order 45 Section IX C.2 and D; Notice has NOT been electronically mailed to: Colette Stone Stone & Sidran A Professional Coporation 2125 Ygnacio Valley Road Suite 101 Walnut Creek, CA 94598 Counsel are responsible for distributing copies of this document to co-counsel who have not registered for e-filing under the court's CM/ECF program.

United States District Court

11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

For the Northern District of California

2