Spilsbury v. Target Corporation et al

Filing 68

ORDER DENYING 52 Defendants' Motion to Shorten Time. Defendants' motion for protective order shall be heard on February 1, 2011. Signed by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd on 12/24/2010. (hrllc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/24/2010)

Spilsbury v. Target Corporation et al

Doc. 68

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

** E-filed December 24, 2010 **

NOT FOR CITATION IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION THOMAS SPILSBURY, JR., v. Plaintiff, No. C09-05955 HRL ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS' REQUEST TO SHORTEN TIME [Re: Docket No. 52]

United States District Court

11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

For the Northern District of California

TARGET CORPORATION, et al., Defendants. ____________________________________/

On December 17, 2010, Defendants filed a motion for a protective order. Docket No. 53. Defendants' also filed a request for the Court to hear oral argument on Defendants' motion on shortened time. Docket No. 52. Plaintiff opposes Defendants' request. Docket No. 57. Having considered the arguments of the parties, the Court does not find good cause to hear Defendants' motion on shortened time, so Defendants' request is DENIED. Defendants' motion for a protective order shall be heard on February 1, 2011 at 10:00 a.m. Briefing on Defendants' motion shall proceed in accordance with Civil Local Rule 7-3. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: December 24, 2010
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

HOWARD R. LLOYD

Dockets.Justia.com

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

C09-05955 JW (HRL) Notice will be electronically mailed to: Juliet MacMillin Lompa Timothy Dennis McMahon [e-mail], [e-mail] [e-mail], [e-mail], [e-mail]

5:09-cv-05955-JW Please see General Order 45 Section IX C.2 and D; Notice has NOT been electronically mailed to: Colette Stone Stone & Sidran A Professional Coporation 2125 Ygnacio Valley Road suite 101 Walnut Creek, CA 94598 Counsel are responsible for distributing copies of this document to co-counsel who have not registered for e-filing under the court's CM/ECF program.

United States District Court

11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

For the Northern District of California

2