Vinayagam v. Cronous Solutions, Inc. et al

Filing 19

STIPULATION AND ORDER RE BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR DEFENDANTS' 12 MOTION TO DISMISS, OR ALTERNATIVELY, TO TRANSFER VENUE re 18 Stipulation. Signed by Judge James Ware on 2/1/2010. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/1/2010)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
LIT T LE R ME N D E LS O N
A PR O F E S S I O N A L C O R P O R A T I O N 50 W. Sa n F e r n a n d o, 15th F lo o r Sa n Jose , C A 95113.2303 408. 99 8 . 41 5 0

GINA M. CHANG, Bar No. 260747 [e-mail] NATHALIE A. LE NGOC, Bar No. 254376 [e-mail] LITTLER MENDELSON A Professional Corporation 50 West San Fernando Street 15th Floor San Jose, CA 95113.2303 Telephone: [phone] Fax No.: 408.288.5686 Attorneys for Defendants CRONOUS SOLUTIONS INC., EIS TECHNOLOGIES, SWAPNA PASHAM, KIRAN PASHAM and NAVEEN MIGLANI UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION NITHYA VINAYAGAM, an individual, Plaintiff, v. CRONOUS SOLUTIONS INC., a Delaware Corporation; EIS TECHNOLOGIES, a Georgia Corporation; SWAPNA PASHAM, an individual; KIRAN PASHAM, an individual; NAVEEN MIGLANI, an individual, and DOES 1-25, Defendants. Case No. C 09-06087 JW STIPULATION RE BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS, OR ALTERNATIVELY, TO TRANSFER VENUE, AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

The parties, by their undersigned counsel, stipulate and agree to the following briefing schedule for Defendants' Motion to Dismiss, or Alternatively, to Transfer Venue, set for hearing on April 12, 2010, as follows: Deadline for Plaintiff to file an Opposition to Defendants' Motion is 3/12/10; and Deadline for Defendants to file their Reply Brief is 3/26/10.

Firmwide:93861596.1 064384.1001

Case No. C 09-06087 JW

STIPULATION RE BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS, OR ALTERNATIVELY, TO TRANSFER VENUE, AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27

Dated: January 28, 2010

Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Gina M. Chang GINA M. CHANG LITTLER MENDELSON A Professional Corporation Attorneys for Defendants CRONOUS SOLUTIONS INC., EIS TECHNOLOGIES, SWAPNA PASHAM, KIRAN PASHAM and NAVEEN MIGLANI Dated: January 28, 2010 Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Jacquetta M. Lannan JACQUETTA M. LANNAN PIERCE & SHEARER LLP A Professional Corporation Attorneys for Plaintiff NITHYA VINAYAGAM

ORDER The Court, having reviewed the foregoing Stipulation, hereby approves the Stipulation. The Plaintiff's deadline to file their Opposition to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss, or Alternatively, to Transfer Venue is now set for March 12, 2010. The Defendants' deadline to file their Reply Brief is now set for March 26, 2010. IT IS SO ORDERED.

February 1, 2010 DATED: __________________________

_________________________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

Firmwide:93861596.1 064384.1001

28
LIT T LE R ME N D E LS O N
A PR O F E S S I O N A L C O R P O R A T I O N 50 W. Sa n F e r n a n d o, 15th F lo o r Sa n Jose , C A 95113.2303 408. 99 8 . 41 5 0

2.

Case No. C 09-06087 JW

STIPULATION RE BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS, OR ALTERNATIVELY, TO TRANSFER VENUE, AND [PROPOSED] ORDER