Software Rights Archive, LLC v. Google Inc. et al

Filing 13

NOTICE by Yahoo! Inc. re 1 MOTION to Compel, 6 MOTION to Compel Continuing Hearing (Hung, Richard) (Filed on 2/10/2009)

Download PDF
Software Rights Archive, LLC v. Google Inc. et al Doc. 13 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 MICHAEL A. JACOBS (CA SBN 111664) mjacobs@mofo.com RICHARD S.J. HUNG (CA SBN 197425) rhung@mofo.com MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP 425 Market Street San Francisco, CA 94105-2482 Telephone: (415) 268-7000 Facsimile: (415) 268-7522 ATTORNEYS FOR YAHOO! INC. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION SOFTWARE RIGHTS ARCHIVE, LLC, Plaintiff, v. GOOGLE INC., YAHOO! INC., IAC SEARCH & MEDIA, INC., AOL LLC, and LYCOS, INC. Defendant. Case No. Misc. Action 09-80004 (Case No. 2:07-cv-511 (CE) pending in the Eastern District of Texas) NOTICE OF CONTINUANCE RE: YAHOO!'S MOTIONS TO COMPEL COMPLIANCE WITH SUBPOENAS TO WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI AND MURRAY & MURRAY, P.C. NOT. OF CONTINUANCE Case No. Misc. Action 09-80004 sf-2640771 Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Please take notice that, pending a ruling in Google Inc. et al. v. Egger et al., Case No. C08-03172-RMW on the parties' Agreed Rule 7-11 Motion to Consolidate Pending Motions and Assign this Miscellaneous Action (No. C-09-80004) to Judge Whyte, Yahoo! Inc. hereby continues the hearing on its Motions to Compel Compliance with Subpoenas to Murray & Murray P.C. and Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati, filed January 20, 2009 and currently set for Tuesday, February 24, 2009. The parties are conferring on alternate dates for the hearing and expect to advise the Court within the next few weeks. Dated: February 10, 2009 MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP By: ___/s/ Richard S.J. Hung__________ Richard S.J. Hung Attorneys for Plaintiff Yahoo! Inc. NOT. OF CONTINUANCE Case No. Misc. Action 09-80004 sf-2640771 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?