Software Rights Archive, LLC v. Google Inc. et al

Filing 35

Download PDF
Software Rights Archive, LLC v. Google Inc. et al Doc. 35 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 PETER D. KEISLER Assistant Attorney General, Civil Division CARL J. NICHOLS Deputy Assistant Attorney General DOUGLAS N. LETTER Terrorism Litigation Counsel JOSEPH H. HUNT Director, Federal Programs Branch ANTHONY J. COPPOLINO Special Litigation Counsel tony.coppolino@usdoj.gov RENÉE S. ORLEANS ANDREW H. TANNENBAUM ALEXANDER K. HAAS Trial Attorneys U.S. Department of Justice Civil Division, Federal Programs Branch 20 Massachusetts Avenue, NW Washington, D.C. 20001 Phone: (202) 514-4782 Fax: (202) 616-8470 Attorneys for Federal Defendants in their Official Capacities and Federal Intervenor-Defendants (United States of America, National Security Agency, President George W. Bush) UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA IN RE NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY TELECOMMUNICATIONS RECORDS LITIGATION This Document Relates To: Hepting, et al. v. AT&T Corp., et al., No. C 06 0672 VRW ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. M:06-cv-01791-VRW STATUS REPORT OF THE UNITED STATES Judge: Courtroom: Hon. Vaughn R. Walker 6, 17th Floor In response to the Court's Order of August 14, 2006 in the Hepting action (C 06-672 VRW), which requested a report by the parties on the status of: (i) the petitions for interlocutory appeal in that action by the United States and Defendant AT&T; and (ii) the status of 28 U.S.C. § 1407 transfers pursuant to MDL 1791, the United States joins in, and respectfully refers the Court to, the description of the status of these proceedings set forth in the report submitted today Status Report of the United States Aug. 14, 2006 Order (Hepting Dkt. No. 336) MDL No. 06-1791-VRW Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 by Hepting Defendant AT&T (Dkt. No. 34-1). Respectfully submitted, PETER D. KEISLER Assistant Attorney General, Civil Division CARL J. NICHOLS Deputy Assistant Attorney General DOUGLAS N. LETTER Terrorism Litigation Counsel JOSEPH H. HUNT Director, Federal Programs Branch s/ Anthony J. Coppolino ANTHONY J. COPPOLINO Special Litigation Counsel tony.coppolino@usdoj.gov RENÉE S. ORLEANS ANDREW H. TANNENBAUM ALEXANDER K. HAAS Trial Attorneys U.S. Department of Justice Civil Division, Federal Programs Branch 20 Massachusetts Avenue, NW Washington, D.C. 20001 Phone: (202) 514-4782 Fax: (202) 616-8470 Attorneys for Federal Defendants in their Official Capacities and Federal Intervenor-Defendants (United States of America,National Security Agency, President George W. Bush) DATED: September 15, 2006 Status Report of the United States Aug. 14, 2006 Order (Hepting Dkt. No. 336) MDL No. 06-1791-VRW -2- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that the foregoing STATUS REPORT OF THE UNITED STATES, Case No. M 06-0791-VRW (re: Hepting, 06-CV-676), will be served by means of the Court's CM/ECF system, which will send notifications to ECF registered counsel including: Electronic Frontier Foundation Cindy Cohn Lee Tien Kurt Opsahl Kevin S. Bankston Corynne McSherry James S. Tyre 545 Shotwell Street San Francisco, CA 94110 Lerach Coughlin Stoia Geller Rudman & Robbins LLP Reed R. Kathrein Jeff D. Friedman Shana E. Scarlett 100 Pine Street, Suite 2600 San Francisco, CA 94111 Traber & Voorhees Bert Voorhees Theresa M. Traber 128 North Fair Oaks Avenue, Suite 204 Pasadena, CA 91103 Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP Bruce A. Ericson David L. Anderson Patrick S. Thompson Jacob R. Sorensen Brian J. Wong 50 Freemont Street PO Box 7880 San Francisco, CA 94120-7880 Sidley & Austin LLP David W. Carpenter Bradford Berenson Edward R. McNicholas David L. Lawson 1501 K Street, NW Washington, DC 20005 s/ Anthony J. Coppolino CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE, Case No. M 06-01791-VRW

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?