Software Rights Archive, LLC v. Google Inc. et al

Filing 79

Download PDF
Software Rights Archive, LLC v. Google Inc. et al Doc. 79 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 IN RE: NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY TELECOMMUNICATIONS RECORDS LITIGATION This Document Relates To: ALL CASES / Having considered the comments and proposals of the parties presented at the initial case management conference held November 16, 2006, the court ORDERS: (1) To act on behalf of plaintiffs with the responsibilities prescribed in plaintiffs' joint and agreed organization plan, Doc #58, the court designates: (a) as liaison counsel: Lerach, Coughlin, Stoia, Geller, MDL Docket No 06-1791 VRW PRETRIAL ORDER No 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA United United States District Court 11 For the Northern District of California 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Rudman & Robbins, LLP; (b) as co-lead coordinating counsel: Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) and American Civil Liberties Union of Illinois (ACLU-IL); (c) as interim class counsel: EFF; ACLU-IL; Lieff, Cabraser, Heinmann & Bernstein LLC; Motley Rice LLC; Liska, Exnicios & Nungesser; Bruce Afran & the Mayer Law Group; Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 (2) Krislov & Associates, Ltd; Law Offices of Steven E Schwarz; Mason Law Firm and George & Brothers. The court also sets the following schedule: December 21, 2006, at 2:00 pm Hearing on motions to remand brought by plaintiffs in Riordan (06-3574) and Campbell (06-3596) Hearing on media intervenors' motions to unseal documents in Hepting (06-672) Master complaints to be served and filed by plaintiffs All parties to SHOW CAUSE in writing why the Hepting order should not apply to all cases and claims to which the government asserts the state secrets privilege Hearing on the government's motion for a stay pending disposition of the interlocutory appeal in Hepting Hearing on the court's order to SHOW CAUSE why the Hepting order should not apply to all cases and claims to which the government asserts the state secrets privilege (3) December 21, 2006, at 2:00 pm January 8, 2007 United States District Court 11 For the Northern District of California January 25, 2007 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 February 1, 2007, at 2:00 pm February 1, 2007, at 2:00 pm Not later than December 15, 2006, counsel identified in (1) above shall identify the defendants that counsel will name in the master complaints to be filed on January 8, 2007. IT IS SO ORDERED. VAUGHN R WALKER United States District Chief Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?