Negotiated Data Solutions LLC v. Dell Inc.
Filing
22
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd granting 6 Nvidia Corporation's Motion to Stay; denying 12 plaintiff's Motion to Shorten Time. (hrllc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/6/2009)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 NOT FOR CITATION IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION NEGOTIATIED DATA SOLUTIONS, INC., Plaintiff, No. C09-80012MISC JF (HRL) ORDER (1) DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR AN ORDER SHORTENING TIME; AND (2) GRANTING NVIDIA CORPORATION'S MOTION FOR A STAY OF DEPOSITION [Re: Docket Nos. 6 and 12] / Negotiated Data Solutions, Inc. ("N-Data") moves for an order shortening time for briefing and hearing on (a) its motion to compel documents from non-party Nvidia Corporation ("Nvidia"); and (b) Nvidia's motion to quash N-Data's Fed.R.Civ.P. 30(b)(6) deposition subpoenas. Relatedly, Nvidia requests that the court temporarily stay that deposition pending the resolution of the motion to quash. This court does not find good cause for an order shortening time. The record presented indicates that N-Data is now moving to compel discovery that reportedly was the subject of a subpoena duces tecum served nearly one year ago. If N-Data felt this discovery was critical to its case, it surely would not have waited until just before the close of discovery to move to compel (or to seek Nvidia's deposition). Accordingly, the motion for an order shortening time is denied. The parties' respective discovery motions will be heard on March 10, 2009, 10:00 *E-FILED 2/6/2009*
United States District Court
11
For the Northern District of California
12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 v. DELL, INC.,
Defendant.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
a.m. in Courtroom 2. Briefing shall proceed in accordance with a normal 35-day calendar under the court's Civil Local Rules. Nvidia's deposition shall be stayed pending the resolution of Nvidia's motion to quash. SO ORDERED. Dated: February 6, 2009 HOWARD R. LLOYD
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
United States District Court
11
For the Northern District of California
12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
5:09-mc-80012 Notice has been electronically mailed to: D. Stuart Bartow sbartow@goodwinprocter.com Gregory S. Bishop gbishop@goodwinprocter.com, mrubio@goodwinprocter.com, sgonzalez@goodwinprocter.com I. Neel Chatterjee nchatterjee@orrick.com, adalton@orrick.com, htsutsui@orrick.com, kmudurian@orrick.com, mawilliams@orrick.com Julio Cesar Avalos javalos@orrick.com, aako-nai@orrick.com, adalton@orrick.com Vickie L. Feeman vfeeman@orrick.com, aruiz@orrick.com Counsel are responsible for distributing copies of this document to co-counsel who have not registered for e-filing under the court's CM/ECF program.
United States District Court
11
For the Northern District of California
12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?