Tirado v. Arrow Financial Services

Filing 8

ORDER Granting 7 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal. The Clerk shall close this file. ***CMC Deadlines terminated. Signed by Judge James Ware on 4/16/2010. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/16/2010)

Download PDF
UNIT ED 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Todd M. Friedman, Esq. (216752) LAW OFFICES OF TODD M. FRIEDMAN, P.C. 369 S. DOHENY DR. #415 BEVERLY HILLS, CA 90211 877 206-4741 866 633-0228 facsimile tfriedman@AttorneysForConsumers.com Attorney for Plaintiff S S DISTRICT TE C TA C F D IS T IC T O R 4/13/2010 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA N ) Case No. 5:10-CV-00012-JW ) ) NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY ) DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ER LORI TIRADO, Plaintiff, vs. ARROW FINANCIAL, LLC, Defendant. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that Plaintiff has filed with the Clerk of the Northern District Court of California, Plaintiff's Notice of Voluntary Dismissal With Prejudice, a copy of which is herewith served upon Defendant. RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED this 13th day of April, 2010. By: s/Todd M. Friedman Todd M. Friedman, Esq. LAW OFFICES OF TODD M. FRIEDMAN, P.C. 369 S. DOHENY DR. #415 BEVERLY HILLS, CA 90211 877 206-4741 866 633-0228 facsimile tfriedman@AttorneysForConsumers.com Attorney for Plaintiff Notice of Dismissal - 1 A LI FO mes Wa Judge Ja re R NIA ERED O ORD D IT IS S DIFIE AS MO RT U O NO RT H 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Filed electronically on this 13th day of April, 2010, with: United States District Court CM/ECF system And hereby served upon all parties By: s/Todd M. Friedman Todd M. Friedman IT IS SO ORDERED: The Court terminates any remaining pending deadlines, hearings and motions. The Clerk shall close this file. Dated: April 16, 2010 ___________________________ United States District Court Notice of Dismissal - 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?