The Standard Fire Insurance Company v. Olsen

Filing 21

ORDER BY JUDGE JEREMY FOGEL RE 18 20 DEFENDANT'S REQUEST TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. (jflc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/14/2010)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Defendant Perry Olsen ("Defendant") has requested that the Court continue the case management conference ("CMC") currently scheduled for April 23, 2010. A hearing on Defendant's motion to dismiss or stay also is scheduled for April 23. Defendant contends that if the Court were to grant his motion, a CMC and the related additional attorney's fees incurred would be unnecessary. Plaintiff The Standard Fire Insurance Company ("Plaintiff") opposes the request. The Court frequently conducts a CMC immediately following a motion hearing. If indeed the Court is inclined to grant Defendant's motion, the CMC will be very brief. If the Court is inclined to deny the motion or to grant Plaintiff leave to amend its complaint, the presence of counsel immediately following the hearing to discuss case management issues will save time and expense for both parties. Accordingly, Defendant's request is DENIED. C a s e Number CV 10-0056 JF (PVT) O R D E R RE DEFENDANT'S REQUEST TO CONTINUE THE SCHEDULED CASE MANAGEMENT CON FERENCE (J FL C 1 ) **E-Filed 4/14/2010** IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION THE STANDARD FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. Re: Docket Nos. 18, 20 PERRY OLSEN, Defendant. Case Number CV 10-0056 JF (PVT) ORDER RE DEFENDANT'S REQUEST TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: 4/14/10 ____________________________ JEREMY FOGEL United States District Judge 2 C a s e Number CV 10-0056 JF (PVT) O R D E R RE DEFENDANT'S REQUEST TO CONTINUE THE SCHEDULED CASE MANAGEMENT CON FERENCE (J FL C 1 )

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?