G & G Closed Circuit Events, LLC v. Nguyen et al
Filing
33
ORDER Requesting Clarification re 32 Stipulation filed by G & G Closed Circuit Events, LLC. Signed by Judge Lucy H. Koh on April 22, 2013. (lhklc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/22/2013)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
9
SAN JOSE DIVISION
16
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
17
On February 1, 2011, this Court granted the parties’ stipulation dismissing the claims
12
13
14
G & G CLOSED CIRCUIT EVENTS, LLC,
Plaintiff,
v.
DUY TRONG NGUYEN, et al.,
15
Defendants.
Case No.: 5:10-CV-00168-LHK
ORDER REQUESTING
CLARIFICATION
18
asserted in the above-captioned action, pursuant to a settlement of the parties. ECF No. 31. The
19
case was dismissed with prejudice, and the file was closed, although the Court retained jurisdiction
20
to and including November 24, 2011 in the event that there was a motion from either party to
21
enforce the settlement agreement. Id.
22
On April 19, 2013, the parties filed another stipulation of dismissal without prejudice,
23
which would be deemed to be with prejudice if no Party filed a motion to reopen the action by
24
August 1, 2014. ECF No. 32. The stipulation is signed by Thomas Riley, representing Plaintiff,
25
and Nicholas Roscha of Roscha & Odne, LLP, purportedly representing Defendants. Id. Neither
26
Nicholas Roscha nor any other attorney from Roscha & Odne, LLP has entered an appearance in
27
this closed case.
28
The parties are hereby ordered to file a clarification of the significance of the April 19, 2013
stipulation.
Case No.: 5:10-CV-00168-LHK
ORDER REQUESTING CLARIFICATION
1
2
3
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: April 22, 2013
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Case No.: 5:10-CV-00168-LHK
ORDER REQUESTING CLARIFICATION
_____________________________
LUCY H. KOH
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?