TMX Funding, Inc. v. Impero Technologies, Inc. et al

Filing 170

STIPULATION AND ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS re 168 , Case referred to mediation. Signed by Judge Jeremy Fogel on 7/23/10. (dlm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/26/2010)

__________________________________________________/

____________________________________________

____________________________________ __ ___ _ ___ _ ___
______________

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
TMX Funding, Inc., Plaintiff(s), CASE NO. C 10-00202 JF (PVT)
V.

Impero Technologies, Inc., et. al. Defendant(s).

[P ----- OS----STIPULATION AND ---ROP----ED] ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS
Dockets.Justia.com

Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5: The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process:
Court Processes:

El E]

Non-binding Arbitration (ADR L.R. 4) Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5) Mediation (ADR L.R. 6)

(Note: Parties who believe that an early settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge is appreciably more likely to meet their needs than any other form of ADR, must participate in an ADR phone conference and may not file this form. They must instead file a Notice of Need for ADR Phone Conference. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 andADR L.R. 3-5) Private Process: El Private ADR (please identify process and provider) The parties agree to hold the ADR session by: El the presumptive deadline (The deadline is 90 days from the date of the order referring the case to an ADR process unless otherwise ordered.)
The Court ordered the parties to complete ADR before August 27,

other requested deadline 2010 (date of continued Case Management Conference). Dated:July 12, 2010 Attorney for Dated:_____ Attorney for tcendants Impero Technologies, Inc., Nicholas Steigelman, Joseph Zhang, Mitchell Heinlein, and Michelle Dover
Dated:

aintiff

Attorney for Defendants Ronald Lesniak and David Lesniak
Dated:

American LegalNet, Inc

www.USCourlForms.com

______________________________________________I

__________________________________________ ________________

_______________________

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
TMX Funding, Inc.,

Plaintiff(s),
CASE NO, C 10-00202 JF (PVT)
V.

Impero Technologies, Inc., et. al. Defendant(s).

STIPULATION AND ---R-O-P----E--[P - - -OS - D] ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS

Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5: The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process: Court Processes: Non-binding Arbitration (ADR L.R. 4) Q Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5) Mediation (ADR L.R. 6) (Note: Parties who believe that an early settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge is appreciably more likely to meet their needs than any other form of ADR, must participate in an ADR phone conference and may not file this form. They must instead file a Notice of Need for ADR Phone `onference. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5)

Private Process:

Q

Private ADR (please identify process and provider)

The parties agree to hold the ADR session by: D the presumptive deadline (The deadline ix 90 days from the date of the order referring the case to an ADR process unless otherwise ordered.)
The Court ordered the parties to complete ADR before August 27,

other requested deadline 2010 (daceof continued Case Management Conference). Dated:July 12,2010 2 j. Attorney for&[aintiff TMX Funding, Inc.
Dated:

Attorney for Defendants Impero Techno gies, Inc., Nicholas Steigelman, Josep ang, itchell Heinlein, and Michelle Do Dated:

1

Atto ey for efendants Ro Id Lesniak and David Lesniak

Dated:

Am.*c.n Leg&N.I, Inc. www.USCcurtFonne.com

_____________________________________

-[PROPOSED] ORDER ---------------Pursuant to the Stipulation above, the captioned matter is hereby referred to: El Non-binding Arbitration El Early Neutral Evaluation (fINE) Mediation El Private ADR Deadline for ADR session El 90 days from the date of this order. other August 26, 2010

IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated:_7_23/10 ________ _/ _____

M ------ TR ----UNITED STATES ---AGIS----ATE JUDGE

DISTRICT

Asn.,icn 1.gINat, Inc. www.USCoudFomlLcom