TMX Funding, Inc. v. Impero Technologies, Inc. et al

Filing 62

ORDER ISSUING PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION. Signed by Judge Jeremy Fogel on 3/31/10. (jflc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/31/2010)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 **E-Filed 3/31/10** IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION TMX FUNDING, INC., a Delaware corporation, Plaintiffs, v. IMPERO TECHNOLOGIES, INC., A California Corporation; CLARENCE NICHOLAS STEIGELMAN, An Individual; RONALD J LESNIAK, An Individual; MITCHELL A HEINLEIN, An Individual; JOSEPH ZHANG, a.k.a. XIANGCHOU ZHANG, An Individual; MICHELLE DOVER, An Individual; And DAVID LESNIAK, An Individual, Defendants. Case Number C 10-00202 JF (PVT) ORDER1 ISSUING PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION On February 12, 2010, Plaintiff TMX Funding, Inc.'s ("TMX") Order to Show Cause Re: Preliminary Injunction came on for hearing in Courtroom 3 of the above-captioned court, the Honorable Jeremy Fogel presiding. TMX appeared through its counsel, Peter D. Holbrook of This disposition is not designated for publication in the official reports. C a s e Number C 10-00202 JF O R D E R ISSUING PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION (J FE X 2 ) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Buchalter Nemer, P.C. Defendants Impero Technologies, Inc., Clarence Nicholas Steigelman, Mitchell Heinlein, Joseph Zhang, Ronald Lesniak, David Lesniak, and Michelle Dover appeared through their counsel, Andrew K. Jacobson. The Court, having considered all admissible evidence in the moving papers, the opposition papers, and having considered the argument of counsel, finds that good cause is shown for the issuance of a Preliminary Injunction, as follows: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT Defendants Impero Technologies, Inc., Clarence Nicholas Steigelman, Mitchell Heinlein, Yizhou "Joseph" Zhang, Ronald Lesniak, David Lesniak, and Michelle Dover, and each of them, and any of their directors, officers, shareholders, partners, subsidiaries, affiliates, employees, employers, agents, representatives, and all those in active concert or participation with them ("Defendants"), are preliminarily restrained and enjoined from: 1. Failing to return to TMX the Teledex laptops and any other equipment or materials containing proprietary, confidential, or trade secret information; and 2. Soliciting business from customers or third party vendors with whom Defendants had been in communication with during their final six months at Teledex for the purpose of furthering Teledex business; and 3. Continuing to do business with customers or third party vendors with whom Defendants had been in communication with during their final six months at Teledex for the purpose of furthering Teledex business and from whom Defendants solicited business after December 8, 2009. Nothing in this Order shall prevent Defendants from otherwise doing business or continuing to do business with customers or third party vendors. // // // // // 2 C a s e Number C 10-00202 JF O R D E R ISSUING PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION (J FE X 2 ) 1 2 3 4 5 6 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT TMX shall post a bond in the amount of $25,000 and the Preliminary Injunction shall issue upon the date of TMX's filing of undertaking of the sum specified. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: March 31, 2010 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 C a s e Number C 10-00202 JF O R D E R ISSUING PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION (J FE X 2 ) JEREMY FOGEL United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?